Challenges facing interdisciplinary researchers: Findings from a professional development workshop

Abstract

Interdisciplinary research is the synergistic combination of two or more disciplines to achieve one research objective. Current research highlights the importance of interdisciplinary research in science education, particularly between educational experts within a particular science discipline (discipline-based education researchers) and those who study human learning in a more general sense (learning scientists). However, this type of interdisciplinary research is not common and little empirical evidence exists that identifies barriers and possible solutions. We hosted a pre-conference workshop for Discipline-Based Educational Researchers and Learning Scientists designed to support interdisciplinary collaborations. We collected evidence during our workshop regarding barriers to interdisciplinary collaborations in science education, perceptions of perceived cohesion in participants’ home university departments and professional communities, and the impact of our workshop on fostering new connections. Based on participants’ responses, we identified three categories of barriers, Disciplinary Differences, Professional Integration, and Collaborative Practice. Using a post-conference survey, we found an inverse pattern in perceived cohesion to home departments compared to self-identified professional communities. Additionally, we found that after the workshop participants reported increased connections across disciplines. Our results provide empirical evidence regarding challenges to interdisciplinary research in science education and suggest that small professional development workshops have the potential for facilitating durable interdisciplinary networks where participants feel a sense of belonging not always available in their home departments.

The role of psychosocial factors in the interprofessional management of women with chronic pelvic pain: A systematic review

“… 31 Another point may be that interprofessional study designs are more complex to implement than monoprofessional studies. 45 Monocausal conclusions are often not possible, and the occurrence of comorbid mental illnesses, especially depressive symptoms, can lead to high rates of dropouts and delays in data collection. 46 Urgent action is needed to improve the scientific data situation, especially in relation to the stated outcome parameters as well as other psychosocial outcome parameters such as quality of life.…”

The Journey of Doctoral Research Challenges and Lessons Learnt

“…IR is understood by other authors as a modality to answer to the complex topics of modern times, covering a perimeter difficult to solve by classical disciplines (CohenMiller and Pate, 2019). Furthermore IR puts together "methods, knowledge, assumptions, and frameworks from separate disciplines" (Daniel et al, 2022).…”

Research through co-design

“…The first is about the terms and knowledge to be managed within the co-design process for addressing a research objective as we discussed so far. And we argue this can be a common topic with general interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinary research challenges and/or barriers (Domino, Smith & Johnson 2007; Axelsson 2010; Arnold 2020; Daniel et al 2022). The second is about the terminology for defining the co-design.…”