Challenges for a broad international implementation of the current severe community-acquired pneumonia guidelines
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Cited by 4 publications
References 68 publications
D-PRISM: a global survey-based study to assess diagnostic and treatment approaches in pneumonia managed in intensive care
Background Pneumonia remains a significant global health concern, particularly among those requiring admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Despite the availability of international guidelines, there remains heterogeneity in clinical management. The D-PRISM study aimed to develop a global overview of how pneumonias (i.e., community-acquired (CAP), hospital-acquired (HAP), and Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP)) are diagnosed and treated in the ICU and compare differences in clinical practice worldwide. Methods The D-PRISM study was a multinational, survey-based investigation to assess the diagnosis and treatment of pneumonia in the ICU. A self-administered online questionnaire was distributed to intensive care clinicians from 72 countries between September to November 2022. The questionnaire included sections on professional profiles, current clinical practice in diagnosing and managing CAP, HAP, and VAP, and the availability of microbiology diagnostic tests. Multivariable analysis using multiple regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between reported antibiotic duration and organisational variables collected in the study. Results A total of 1296 valid responses were collected from ICU clinicians, spread between low-and-middle income (LMIC) and high-income countries (HIC), with LMIC respondents comprising 51% of respondents. There is heterogeneity across the diagnostic processes, including clinical assessment, where 30% (389) did not consider radiological evidence essential to diagnose pneumonia, variable collection of microbiological samples, and use and practice in bronchoscopy. Microbiological diagnostics were least frequently available in low and lower-middle-income nation settings. Modal intended antibiotic treatment duration was 5–7 days for all types of pneumonia. Shorter durations of antibiotic treatment were associated with antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs, high national income status, and formal intensive care training. Conclusions This study highlighted variations in clinical practice and diagnostic capabilities for pneumonia, particularly issues with access to diagnostic tools in LMICs were identified. There is a clear need for improved adherence to existing guidelines and standardized approaches to diagnosing and treating pneumonia in the ICU. Trial registration As a survey of current practice, this study was not registered. It was reviewed and endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Graphical abstract
D-PRISM: a global survey-based study to assess diagnostic and treatment approaches in pneumonia managed in intensive care
Background Pneumonia remains a significant global health concern, particularly among those requiring admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Despite the availability of international guidelines, there remains heterogeneity in clinical management. The D-PRISM study aimed to develop a global overview of how pneumonias (i.e., community-acquired (CAP), hospital-acquired (HAP), and Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP)) are diagnosed and treated in the ICU and compare differences in clinical practice worldwide. Methods The D-PRISM study was a multinational, survey-based investigation to assess the diagnosis and treatment of pneumonia in the ICU. A self-administered online questionnaire was distributed to intensive care clinicians from 72 countries between September to November 2022. The questionnaire included sections on professional profiles, current clinical practice in diagnosing and managing CAP, HAP, and VAP, and the availability of microbiology diagnostic tests. Multivariable analysis using multiple regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between reported antibiotic duration and organisational variables collected in the study. Results A total of 1296 valid responses were collected from ICU clinicians, spread between low-and-middle income (LMIC) and high-income countries (HIC), with LMIC respondents comprising 51% of respondents. There is heterogeneity across the diagnostic processes, including clinical assessment, where 30% (389) did not consider radiological evidence essential to diagnose pneumonia, variable collection of microbiological samples, and use and practice in bronchoscopy. Microbiological diagnostics were least frequently available in low and lower-middle-income nation settings. Modal intended antibiotic treatment duration was 5–7 days for all types of pneumonia. Shorter durations of antibiotic treatment were associated with antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs, high national income status, and formal intensive care training. Conclusions This study highlighted variations in clinical practice and diagnostic capabilities for pneumonia, particularly issues with access to diagnostic tools in LMICs were identified. There is a clear need for improved adherence to existing guidelines and standardized approaches to diagnosing and treating pneumonia in the ICU. Trial registration As a survey of current practice, this study was not registered. It was reviewed and endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Graphical abstract
D-PRISM, a global study of diagnostic approaches in severe pneumonia.
Purpose Pneumonia remains a significant global health concern, particularly among those requiring admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Despite the availability of international guidelines there remains heterogeneity in clinical management. The D-PRISM study aimed to develop a global overview of how pneumonias (i.e., community-acquired (CAP), hospital-acquired (HAP), and Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP)) are diagnosed and treated in the ICU and compare differences in clinical practice worldwide. Methods The D-PRISM study was a multinational, survey-based investigation to assess the diagnosis and treatment of pneumonia in the ICU. A self-administered online questionnaire was distributed to intensive care clinicians from 72 countries between September to November 2022. The questionnaire included sections on professional profiles, current clinical practice in diagnosing and managing CAP, HAP, and VAP, and the availability of microbiology diagnostic tests. Results A total of 1296 valid responses were collected from ICU clinicians, spread between low-and-middle income (LMIC) and high-income countries (HIC), with LMIC respondents comprising 51% of respondents. There is heterogeneity across the processes of diagnosis, including in clinical assessment where 30% (389) did not require radiological evidence to diagnose pneumonia, variable collection of microbiological samples and use and practice in bronchoscopy. Modal antibiotic treatment duration was 5–7 days for all types of pneumonia. Conclusions This study highlighted variations in clinical practice and diagnostic capabilities for pneumonia, particularly issues with access to diagnostic tools in LMICs were identified. There is a clear need for improved adherence to existing guidelines and standardised approaches to diagnosing and treating pneumonia in the ICU.
The effect and safety of corticosteroid treatment for severe community-acquired pneumonia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
BackgroundThere is ongoing debate on the efficacy and safety of corticosteroid therapy for severe community-acquired pneumonia (sCAP). Our aim was to investigate the safety and therapeutic effectiveness of corticosteroids in the sCAP therapy.MethodsElectronic databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science and Embase) were searched from inception to January 10, 2024. We examined for randomized controlled studies assessing the effectiveness and safety of corticosteroid therapy in individuals with sCAP. The primary outcome was short-term mortality. Subgroup analyses were carried out according to the corticosteroid type. Additionally, trial sequential analysis (TSA) was carried out.ResultsIn total, 11 trials, including 1959 patients, met the predetermined standards and underwent analysis. Overall, our meta-analysis exhibited that corticosteroids may considerably lower short-term mortality when compared to control treatment [6 studies (1,582 patients); odds ratio (OR), 0.65; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49–0.88; p = 0.005] and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels [5 studies (359 patients); mean difference (MD), −6.97; 95% CI −12.33 to −1.60; p = 0.01], but TSA revealed that the sample size needs to be larger. Moreover, we observed that corticosteroids reduced the hospital length of stay [7 studies (999 patients); MD, −3.56; 95% CI, −4.28 to −2.84; p < 0.001], need for mechanical ventilation (MV) [7 studies (1,328 patients); OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.45–0.79; p = 0.001] and MV duration [4 studies (736 patients); MD, −5.62; 95% CI, −7.31 to −3.94; p < 0.001], which was in agreement with TSA. However, adverse events, length of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay were not evidently shortened when TSA was utilized. Furthermore, subgroup analysis revealed that all of the above studies benefited from hydrocortisone treatment in comparison to the control group.ConclusionOur meta-analysis revealed that corticosteroids, especially hydrocortisone, could decrease the mortality of individuals with sCAP.Systematic review registration[https://clinicaltrials.gov/], identifier [CRD42023415555].
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
Contact Info
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Product
Resources
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.
