2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10113-014-0643-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges for mainstreaming climate change into EU flood and drought policy: Water retention measures in the Warta River Basin, Poland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increasing the volume of retained water by creating various forms of small-scale retention can increase water resources and improve the rational management of such resources, especially from a local and regional perspective (Łabędzki 2016;Linnerooth-Bayer et al 2015; Ministry of the Environment 2013; Mioduszewski et al 2014;Szwed 2015). This is particularly important in areas with limited water resources (Ceppi et al 2014;Kumar et al 2009;Ravazzani et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing the volume of retained water by creating various forms of small-scale retention can increase water resources and improve the rational management of such resources, especially from a local and regional perspective (Łabędzki 2016;Linnerooth-Bayer et al 2015; Ministry of the Environment 2013; Mioduszewski et al 2014;Szwed 2015). This is particularly important in areas with limited water resources (Ceppi et al 2014;Kumar et al 2009;Ravazzani et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each jurisdiction attempts to reduce flood damage within a limited border and thus focuses on the use of defensive structural measures rather than measures to reduce flows. While measures that reduce flows are only able to provide limited local benefits (Linnerooth‐Bayer et al ., ), they also provide downstream benefits. These benefits may, in the aggregate, be cost effective, but in isolation, it is difficult to justify the costs, particularly as payments for implementation require that the seller have the right to sell the service.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For other NWRM, such as polders, the primary impact is on flood risk and there are ancillary benefits for biodiversity or recreational use. As the area covered by NWRM is generally small with respect to managed (agricultural or forest) land area, their individual impact on downstream flooding is relatively minor, and therefore, their interest as a management tool for flood risk managers is also small (Linnerooth‐Bayer et al ., ; Schilling et al ., ; Cook et al ., ). This has led to an expectation that NWRM could be financed as Payments for Environmental Services (PES) either directly or through national agri‐environmental schemes (Kenyon et al ., ).…”
Section: Payment Mechanisms For Nwrmmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study has taken into consideration the influence of local non-climate factors and climatic factors appearing in the Vistula Basin. The achieved knowledge will allow to assess the hydrological drought threat on Vistula in Toruń and the study results may be used for local planning of water management strategies in cases of a crisis [BARKER et al 2016;LINNEROOTH-BAYER et al 2015].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%