Challenges for the Resilience Capacity of Romanian Shrinking Cities

Abstract

Abstract:In the context of deindustrialization and desurbanization, Romanian cities are confronted with issues related to natural demographic decline and out-migration, inducing apparently opposite, but complementary phenomena: slow-burn shrinkage and urban sprawl, which create peripheralisation processes both inside and outside the cities. The current approach acknowledges urban shrinkage within the context of post-communist transformations, but also as a "natural" process in the (adaptive) life cycle of cities. In this context, the study aims to explore the interdependencies between the causes and effects of shrinkage, on the one hand, and the operating feedback mechanisms which might lead to adaptation, on the other. It highlights the changes incurred by the territorial (un)balance combining the spatial analysis of urban shrinkage in relation to the diffused structures imposed by sub-urbanization or metropolisation processes. Using multi-criteria and time series analysis methods, the aim of the assessment is to determine and analyse the significant correlations and trends taking into account relevant demographic, social-economic as well as infrastructural and environmental indicators, in order to describe typologies of urban shrinkage in Romania and their adaptation potential. The results are interpreted in correlation with the need for sustainable strategies and planning, in order to tackle the issue of urban shrinkage in Romania.

Measuring Sustainable Development Goals at a Local Level: A Case of a Metropolitan Area in Romania

“…The increased migration of the population in the communes directly adjacent to the municipality (the first ring communes) led to a fairly earlier development spread in these areas and slower development in the metropolitan fringe [29]. Nevertheless, the outmigration from the center to the outskirts must be considered a natural phenomenon, which requires customized initiatives and adaptive planning [30]. Consequently, there is a need for better consideration of the spatial characteristics, continuous measurement of progress, identification of intervention areas, and customized actions to achieve sustainable results.…”

Urban or Rural: Does It Make A Difference for Economic Resilience? A Modelling Study on Economic and Cultural Geography in Romania

“…Being confronted with the major shock of the Iron Curtain's fall and rapid deindustrialization in the years to follow, a reshaping of local economies was necessary, and the North-West Region was no exception. Studies focusing on the Romanian case identify the factors that affect the resilience capacity of communities: migration, aging, and a decrease in the number of employees are the factors that reduce resilience capacities and enhance urban decline [10]. Other studies on resilience approach the issue from a different perspective, either examining the capacity of creative industries to act as a bulwark against economic crises or to boost recovery [11], pointing out different regional reactions to the global economic shocks [12,13], or testing if either diversification or specialization in local economies is the key in coping with the hardships triggered by the recent recession [14].…”

Sustainable Development of Industry–Environmental System Based on Resilience Perspective

“…The final step is to instantiate the resilience values that calculated by using the catastrophe progression method. Adaptive cycle model is an important model, and has a wide range of applications in resilient analysis [33,38,67]. Adaptive loop provides a systematic approach that uses four phases to illustrate the resilience changes at different stages and reveals the adaptive ability of adaptive loops [21].…”