Challenges in Bioinformatics Workflows for Processing Microbiome Omics Data at Scale

Abstract

The nascent field of microbiome science is transitioning from a descriptive approach of cataloging taxa and functions present in an environment to applying multi-omics methods to investigate microbiome dynamics and function. A large number of new tools and algorithms have been designed and used for very specific purposes on samples collected by individual investigators or groups. While these developments have been quite instructive, the ability to compare microbiome data generated by many groups of researchers is impeded by the lack of standardized application of bioinformatics methods. Additionally, there are few examples of broad bioinformatics workflows that can process metagenome, metatranscriptome, metaproteome and metabolomic data at scale, and no central hub that allows processing, or provides varied omics data that are findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable (FAIR). Here, we review some of the challenges that exist in analyzing omics data within the microbiome research sphere, and provide context on how the National Microbiome Data Collaborative has adopted a standardized and open access approach to address such challenges.

Toward a Predictive Understanding of Cyanobacterial Harmful Algal Blooms through AI Integration of Physical, Chemical, and Biological Data

“…GPU computing and edge computing are popularly used due to the inherent single instruction multiple data (SIMD) nature of the computation . Download and storage of the data can also require petabyte-scale systems such as those hosted by the National Microbiome Data Collaborative …”

“… 117 Download and storage of the data can also require petabyte-scale systems such as those hosted by the National Microbiome Data Collaborative. 118 …”

Integrating Bioinformatics in Cervical Cancer Research: A Comprehensive Review

“…While bioinformatics has significantly advanced cervical cancer research, several challenges remain. Data heterogeneity, computational limitations, and the need for standardized bioinformatics protocols are some of the issues that need to be addressed [9]. Additionally, translating bioinformatics findings into clinical practice requires validation through clinical trials and further studies [10].…”

The need for an integrated multi‐OMICs approach in microbiome science in the food system

“…By way of definition, it informs the researcher on how large a study must be conducted in order to have sufficient statistical power for detecting differences at a given significance (e.g., p < .05) between two groups of samples, for example, case versus controls (Mattiello et al, 2016). While many microbiome studies are underpowered (unable to detect significant effects even when present), combining data from several studies may find correlations or other associations that cannot be revealed by individual studies alone (Hu et al, 2022). This approach is commonly used in human microbiome studies but could also be adopted in other -omics fields for the detection of meaningful differences (Impactt, 2022).…”

“…Some onus must also be placed upon the scientific journals, such as obliging authors to publish both their datasets and associated metadata in accordance with predefined standards, depending on the field. This effort will encourage researchers to preserve their data in repositories and by enabling its reuse, increase its value to microbiome research (Hu et al., 2022; Ryan, Schloter, Berg, Kinkel et al., 2021).…”