Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Horizontal Open Hole Gravel Pack (HOHGP) is the conventional sand control technique for offshore non consolidated reservoirs in Brazil. Gravel pack placement requirements include the design of pumping pressures inside the operational window formed by the minimum pump rate to avoid premature rat hole screen-out and maximum pump rate to avoid formation fracture. Some special projects require additional equipment to provide selective completion - External casing packers (ECP) installed at different positions along the production screen aim the isolation of certain reservoir zones. In these cases, gravel pack placement present an additional constraint - operational pump rates should be high enough to avoid alpha wave sedimentation around the packers to assure sealing after the packer inflation process. Traditionally, design criteria consider a minimum critical velocity to avoid sand deposition. The specification of minimum flow for cleaning the ECP, and prevent the deposition of sand in the annular space can be obtained from different criteria. Two methods are proposed to analyze the problem: a constant velocity and a constant shear stress approach. The major contribution includes computational fluid dynamic simulation (CFD) of the 3D flow around the packer, using a finite volume method. The methodology based on the estimation of the local shear stresses at the interfaces, suggests less conservative numbers which allows effective gravel pack placement in selective completion projects for narrow operational windows. Introduction The unique conditions found in the Brazilian deepwater fields pushed the industry to develop dedicated technology to guarantee technical feasibility and economicity of such projects. Non consolidated reservoirs require sand control and Campos Basin history have been constructed with gravel packing techniques (Marques et al, 2007) and different technological implementations allowed overcoming hydraulic issues in narrow operational window scenarios. Meanwhile optimization of reservoir management practices pushed the development of smart completion technology (Pinto et al, 2001 and 2006), allowing continuous adjustment in multizone wells by remote control of downhole valves, minimizing intervention costs (Robinson, 2003). Besides, improved recovery techniques for viscous oil (Trindade and Branco 2005) and selective completion by isolation of shale interlayers inside horizontal gravel packed wells (Machado et al, 2001) constituted expressive challenges. Selective completion in long horizontal sections was achieved through the use of two equipments which already existed in the oil industry but never had been used together by that time: expandable casing packers (ECP) and diverter valves (DV). To manage production or injection along long horizontal intervals, the reservoir section has to be segmented in a way that each segment can be controlled individually. Selective completion gains in importance in front of reservoir heterogeneities and of lateral permeability contrasts. One additional way to achieve this segmentation would be to split the wells using open hole packers. Concurrently, open hole packers and swellable elastomer technologies are being pursued to achieve segmentation without cemented liners and perforation, which is inherently time consuming, expensive and perhaps sub optimum (Ritchie et al, 2008). Until this moment 9 wells were gravel packed and completed successfully using external casing packers plus diverter valves. Other 8 wells used only ECPs.
Horizontal Open Hole Gravel Pack (HOHGP) is the conventional sand control technique for offshore non consolidated reservoirs in Brazil. Gravel pack placement requirements include the design of pumping pressures inside the operational window formed by the minimum pump rate to avoid premature rat hole screen-out and maximum pump rate to avoid formation fracture. Some special projects require additional equipment to provide selective completion - External casing packers (ECP) installed at different positions along the production screen aim the isolation of certain reservoir zones. In these cases, gravel pack placement present an additional constraint - operational pump rates should be high enough to avoid alpha wave sedimentation around the packers to assure sealing after the packer inflation process. Traditionally, design criteria consider a minimum critical velocity to avoid sand deposition. The specification of minimum flow for cleaning the ECP, and prevent the deposition of sand in the annular space can be obtained from different criteria. Two methods are proposed to analyze the problem: a constant velocity and a constant shear stress approach. The major contribution includes computational fluid dynamic simulation (CFD) of the 3D flow around the packer, using a finite volume method. The methodology based on the estimation of the local shear stresses at the interfaces, suggests less conservative numbers which allows effective gravel pack placement in selective completion projects for narrow operational windows. Introduction The unique conditions found in the Brazilian deepwater fields pushed the industry to develop dedicated technology to guarantee technical feasibility and economicity of such projects. Non consolidated reservoirs require sand control and Campos Basin history have been constructed with gravel packing techniques (Marques et al, 2007) and different technological implementations allowed overcoming hydraulic issues in narrow operational window scenarios. Meanwhile optimization of reservoir management practices pushed the development of smart completion technology (Pinto et al, 2001 and 2006), allowing continuous adjustment in multizone wells by remote control of downhole valves, minimizing intervention costs (Robinson, 2003). Besides, improved recovery techniques for viscous oil (Trindade and Branco 2005) and selective completion by isolation of shale interlayers inside horizontal gravel packed wells (Machado et al, 2001) constituted expressive challenges. Selective completion in long horizontal sections was achieved through the use of two equipments which already existed in the oil industry but never had been used together by that time: expandable casing packers (ECP) and diverter valves (DV). To manage production or injection along long horizontal intervals, the reservoir section has to be segmented in a way that each segment can be controlled individually. Selective completion gains in importance in front of reservoir heterogeneities and of lateral permeability contrasts. One additional way to achieve this segmentation would be to split the wells using open hole packers. Concurrently, open hole packers and swellable elastomer technologies are being pursued to achieve segmentation without cemented liners and perforation, which is inherently time consuming, expensive and perhaps sub optimum (Ritchie et al, 2008). Until this moment 9 wells were gravel packed and completed successfully using external casing packers plus diverter valves. Other 8 wells used only ECPs.
The thin and laterally extensive Al Shaheen reservoirs are developed with extended reach horizontal wells and large-scale water injection, which over the last decade has proved to be a proficient and environmentally favorable recovery scheme. This paper describes how injection water short circuiting between two horizontal wells in excess of 20,000 ft was eliminated with a conformance treatment without the necessity of a costly and operationally risky well intervention. Traditionally, reservoir management in terms of injection or production profile modification has been achieved with rig-based work-over operations applying mechanical solutions such as cement or isolation straddles. Work-over operations utilizing drilling rigs are, however, expensive, pose inherent operational risks and delay the implementation of the ongoing development plans. When water injection was recently commenced in a well taking part of an existing line drive pattern, an immediate pressure and watercut response was observed in the adjacent producer. Attempts were made to mitigate the effect of the communication, but water injection eventually had to be ceased to allow sustainable flow from the production well. The very pronounced response in the producer suggested that short circuiting was occurring through a fracture providing conductivity several orders of magnitude higher than the prevailing matrix conductivity. A comprehensive multi-disciplinary review of static and dynamic data lead to the assessment that the fracture communication could be eliminated utilizing a conformance treatment and following laboratory testing and design, a crystalline superabsorbent copolymer was pumped from a stimulation vessel as part of an intervention- and rig-less operation. After the conformance treatment, injection was resumed with no adverse effects on the performance of the adjacent producer. The treatment is estimated to have recovered lost oil reserves of some 3 MMstb and to have reduced cost with more than USD 8 million compared to a conventional rig-based work-over operation. Introduction Maersk Oil Qatar is the operator of the Al Shaheen Field located on the central axis of the Qatar Arch some 70 kilometers north-east of the Qatar peninsula (Figure 1). The main reservoir targets include the Lower Cretaceous Kharaib B and Shuaiba carbonate formations and the Nahr Umr sandstone (Figure 2). The Kharaib reservoir is a laterally uniform carbonate platform with a full thickness of 80 ft and a reservoir target of some 10 ft. The reservoir comprises tight carbonates with inter and intra granular porosity and local natural fracture networks. The Shuaiba reservoir is a transitional marginal carbonate platform with a full thickness of approximately 200 ft thick and a reservoir target of some 20 ft. The reservoir comprises tight carbonates with inter and intra granular porosity and local natural fracture networks. The Nahr Umr reservoir comprises laterally extensive marginal marine sands with a target thickness of some 5 to 10 ft of unconsolidated, high permeable sand.
This paper compares the petroleum industry with other industries from the technology development aspect. The comparison is based on studying financial as well as Research and Development (R&D) investment data for the Fortune 500 companies. Our industry has been coping with increased hydrocarbon demands by responding to increased challenges to find and produce more hydrocarbons through developing new technologies. Some of the historical key technologies in the petroleum industry are reviewed. The current challenges requiring new and novel technological developments in our industry are also highlighted. We followed a systematic analytical approach to investigate and compare technology development in the petroleum industry with other industries through investigation of public company data for the Fortune 500 companies in addition to major petroleum and major service companies. The investigation reveals an interesting correlation between the profitability of a company and its R&D investment. Also, and within the same industry, companies which invest more in R&D seems to enjoy superior profits over their competitors. Although the oil industry invests significant amounts of money in technology development, it spends less than other industries in both R&D spend as percentage of revenue and the actual amount of money spend.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.