2022
DOI: 10.7861/fhj.2022-0076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges in conducting quality improvement projects: reflections of a junior doctor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, potential biases in observational data collection via the checklist could influence the interpretation of results. Factors such as resistance to change, staff project engagement, technology, or policies may also impact project outcomes [ 25 ]. Addressing these limitations is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of the project's outcomes and implications for future initiatives in hospital pharmacy operations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, potential biases in observational data collection via the checklist could influence the interpretation of results. Factors such as resistance to change, staff project engagement, technology, or policies may also impact project outcomes [ 25 ]. Addressing these limitations is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of the project's outcomes and implications for future initiatives in hospital pharmacy operations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Key challenges to implementing HQI projects of multidisciplinary nature are clinician availability, adequate center capacity and resourcing, coordination of team efforts across multiple areas of expertise and need for strong team leadership. [38][39][40][41][42][43] Limited resourcing and capacity resulted in premature cancellation of the project in one center (Kelowna) and failure to implement the main HQI initiative in another (Vancouver). Merge of MDTs from two centers (Surrey and Abbottsford) was an adaptation mechanism used that is associated with increased capacity and reductions in overall and individual participant burden.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%