2023
DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daac185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges in evaluating implementation and effectiveness in real-world settings: evaluation proposal for school-based health-promoting intervention

Abstract: Summary There are various research designs and approaches to investigate how health-promoting activities are implemented in complex, real-world systems, and to identify potential health effects that might occur following implementation. Although literature describes guidelines to perform and report about implementation research and effect evaluations, no specific guidelines exist on analysing and reporting about the combination of effectiveness data and implementation data collected as part of i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In short, these key points entailed (1) active involvement of various stakeholders (e.g., school staff, children, and parents), (2) taking a school-wide approach, (3) all children engaging in at least one hour of PA every day, and (4) all children consuming a daily healthy lunch at school. More details on the categorisation method based on the HPSF key points are described elsewhere [24].…”
Section: Comparison Of Schoolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In short, these key points entailed (1) active involvement of various stakeholders (e.g., school staff, children, and parents), (2) taking a school-wide approach, (3) all children engaging in at least one hour of PA every day, and (4) all children consuming a daily healthy lunch at school. More details on the categorisation method based on the HPSF key points are described elsewhere [24].…”
Section: Comparison Of Schoolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the project's start, a strong difference in the intensity of project implementation between the schools was expected, which could subsequently serve as a way to categorise and compare schools. However, limited implementation in all schools restricted the ability to create distinct categories and compare schools using the method previously described elsewhere [24]. Instead, schools were categorised into medium and low implementer groups.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%