Advanced Ceramic Materials 2021
DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.96065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges in Rietveld Refinement and Structure Visualization in Ceramics

Abstract: The most common and basic characterization in the field of material science is the almighty X-ray diffraction (XRD). In every institute, every research report and every manuscript, concerning material properties, the X-ray diffraction pattern is essentially found. Although the basis of these works relies on the fact that X-ray diffraction pattern was found to be matching with some structure in a database, the in depth significance of the various characteristic diffraction manifestations of various physical cha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…R exp equals to expected R value and R wp equals to the weighted-profile R-value. Values of R wp /R exp close to 1 indicates the good quality of the Le Bail fitting12…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…R exp equals to expected R value and R wp equals to the weighted-profile R-value. Values of R wp /R exp close to 1 indicates the good quality of the Le Bail fitting12…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The scheelite structure is prevalent in binary molybdates and tungstates, and noteworthy reports underscore their exceptional upconversion (UC) photoluminescence properties. 11,12 Tungstate compounds are widely recognized as essential inorganic functional materials with a rich history of practical applications in scintillation detectors, solid-state lasers, and stimulated Raman scattering (SRS). For instance, crystals like PbWO 4 and CdWO 4 exhibit excellent scintillation properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A value of the weighted profile R factor (R wp ) to expected R factor (R exp ) ratio and a χ 2 closer to unity (Table 2) indicated a satisfactory fit with the calculated model. 49 With a smaller ionic radius (76 pm), Li + is known to occupy either the Na + lattice positions or the lattice voids primarily in the NaYF 4 host lattice and is not expected to replace tripositive lanthanide ions due to a significant charge mismatch. 37,[39][40][41]50 The charge compensation mechanism is thereby attributed to a cation defect hypothesis as reported previously.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%