2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges in riveting quality prediction: a literature survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The criteria in the SPR process are interlock, minimum thickness die-sided part, rivet foot diameter, rivet head position, and maximum joining force, which depend on the concrete set up the process parameter such as material properties, rivet properties, and die geometry (see Fig. 1) [2,6,7,8]. Among these criteria, three prominent aspects need to consider: the rivet head position, the interlock distance, and the minimum remaining bottom material thickness.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The criteria in the SPR process are interlock, minimum thickness die-sided part, rivet foot diameter, rivet head position, and maximum joining force, which depend on the concrete set up the process parameter such as material properties, rivet properties, and die geometry (see Fig. 1) [2,6,7,8]. Among these criteria, three prominent aspects need to consider: the rivet head position, the interlock distance, and the minimum remaining bottom material thickness.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig 8. Distribution of OK and not OK joints concerning the tensile strength ( R m ), ultimate tensile strength ratio ( R m1∕2 ), and sheet thickness ratio ( t 1∕2 ) of the joined parts[2] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heat input was calculated by the correlation between the test specimens and the electrodes using Equation (1) of the AC (Alternating Current) spot welding heat input calculation, where Q is the generated heat input (J), I is the welding current (A), R is the resistance of the specimens (ρ, electrical resistivity (Ω m) SS316L: 7.4 × 10 −7 , AA5754: 5.22 × 10 −8 , Ti 6 Al 4 V: 17,1 × 10 −7 ), and t is the welding time (s) [21][22][23][24]. The samples' resistance in this study was determined using Equation (2). Since this study used dissimilar base metals and interlayer, the sum of three samples' resistance was taken for the generated heat input calculation.…”
Section: Heat Input and Physical Properties Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process aimed to join two pieces of the metal sheet without any additional weight on its joint. Several joining processes, such as riveting and arc welding, place additional weight on the joints, which should be avoided to obtain a good product quality [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]. Considering the additional weight caused by inefficient joining techniques, a recent study by Costanza et al investigated explosion welding, that could be an option to join dissimilar materials without additional weight [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been established that load shared by rivets in composite to metal joining is asymmetric due to difference in stiffness of the two materials which result in the unequal distribution of load in rivets and lead to high susceptibility to cracking. 64 The failure of rivets occurs in various modes such as fatigue failure, shear fracture, and pull off rivet head and crushing failure. Under repeating cyclic loading encountered during flight operations, the riveted joints are subjected to widespread fatigue damage (WFD).…”
Section: Challenges In Joining Of Unequal Thickness Dissimilar Materials In Different Joint Configurations In Aircraft Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%