2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3007517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges in Scaling Down of Free-Floating Implantable Neural Interfaces to Millimeter Scale

Abstract: Implantable neural interface devices are an emerging technology for continuous brain monitoring and brain-computer interface (BCI). Recording of electrical signals from neurons of interest has led to more efficient and personalized diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of neurological disorders. It facilitates the dynamic mapping of the whole brain, improving our understanding of the links between brain functions and behaviors. Stimulation of targeted nerves and neurons has been utilized as an effective therapy … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 204 publications
(237 reference statements)
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although most wirelessly-powered cages provide PTE and PDL for specific experimental conditions, the physical constraints of Rx coils, coil separations, and magnetic field homogeneity over the experimental area should be compared for a more suitable choice. As the most recent class of IMDs are millimeter-sized and distributed over a large area in the brain or the rest of the body [43][44][45][46], the importance of wirelessly-powered cages for tiny multiple implants is elevated as introduced in Section 4. Hence, it is important for designers to select suitable wirelessly-powered cages, considering the practical limitations of IMD design related to key aspects, such as PTE, PDL, closed-loop power control, scalability, spatial/angular misalignment, near-field data telemetry, and safety issues against various perturbations during the longitudinal animal experiment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although most wirelessly-powered cages provide PTE and PDL for specific experimental conditions, the physical constraints of Rx coils, coil separations, and magnetic field homogeneity over the experimental area should be compared for a more suitable choice. As the most recent class of IMDs are millimeter-sized and distributed over a large area in the brain or the rest of the body [43][44][45][46], the importance of wirelessly-powered cages for tiny multiple implants is elevated as introduced in Section 4. Hence, it is important for designers to select suitable wirelessly-powered cages, considering the practical limitations of IMD design related to key aspects, such as PTE, PDL, closed-loop power control, scalability, spatial/angular misalignment, near-field data telemetry, and safety issues against various perturbations during the longitudinal animal experiment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bio-implantable devices have much higher constraints on accessible energy sources, dimensions, and toxicity requirements. An example application with extreme requirements are floating autonomous neural sensors, where ultrasound, infrared, and RF have all been pursued (Yang et al, 2020). Micro and nanoscale sensors have tremendous opportunity to realize "body dust" for biological monitoring that extends beyond wearable and implantable devices (Carrara, 2020).…”
Section: Power Handling Storage and Application Specificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also been proposed as a wireless-power-transfer (WPT) channel for recharging IMDs [23], [24]. Furthermore, it is being touted as an in-body communication and WPT channel for the next-generation mm-sized neural implants for both the Central (CNS) and Peripheral Nervous Systems (PNS) [25], [26]. This is because the size of ultrasound transceivers can be several orders smaller than their electromagnetic (EM) counterparts, which is ideal for scaling-down of IMDs.…”
Section: B Ultrasound Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%