2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2012.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges in the aerodynamics modeling of an oscillating and translating airfoil at large incidence angles

Abstract: The challenges in the modeling of the unsteady lift of a two-dimensional NACA 0012 airfoil oscillating and translating at large incidence angles are investigated in this paper. Forced oscillation motions with two reduced frequency values of 0.1 and 1.0 were used. The CFD results show that a hysteresis loop was developed in the lift variation with angle of attack; shapes of the loops change significantly with reduced frequency value. A dynamic stall vortex was identified in the pitching and plunging motions wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the airfoil is moving, this AoA should be corrected due to the heaving motion with Equation (9), so the controller has to do calculations "on the loop" in order to know this dynamic angle of attack α re f . In reality, the unsteady lift results in being very different to the one described above; it presents non-linearities and hysteresis loops that become very complicated with the online corrections for the dynamic angle of attack, not to mention the effects of the feedback control [44,45].…”
Section: Control Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the airfoil is moving, this AoA should be corrected due to the heaving motion with Equation (9), so the controller has to do calculations "on the loop" in order to know this dynamic angle of attack α re f . In reality, the unsteady lift results in being very different to the one described above; it presents non-linearities and hysteresis loops that become very complicated with the online corrections for the dynamic angle of attack, not to mention the effects of the feedback control [44,45].…”
Section: Control Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…All computations are started from a steady-state solution and clean configuration at 0 deg angles of attack and then advanced in time using second-order accuracy with five Newton subiterations. Timestep size is set to 5 × 10 −4 seconds based on a sensitivity study of the grid in [45]. Note that noncirculatory loads occur over a short period of time, and hence a relatively small time step is needed for accurately calculating these loads.…”
Section: Aerodynamic Modeling At α Equal To Zero Degreesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As time progresses, the normal force asymptotically reaches the steady-state value at 1 deg flap angle. The initial peak can be explained based on the energy of acoustic wave systems created by the initial grid perturbation [45]. The pitch moment also has an initial negative peak and a transient solution until it reaches the steady-state value.…”
Section: Aerodynamic Modeling At α Equal To Zero Degreesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goman and Khrabrov proposed the statespace representation of aerodynamic characteristics at high angles of attack, 11 which is directly amenable to identification and validation from CFD results. 12,13 This paper attempts to investigate the wind tunnel wall interference effects on an oscillating aerofoil in the stall regime as has been accomplished with small amplitude motion. The test case is the two-dimensional NACA0012 aerofoil in the NASA AMRDL-Ames 7 ′ × 10 ′ subsonic wind tunnel, which has a solid wall.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%