2021
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.722202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges in the Development of Soft Sensors for Bioprocesses: A Critical Review

Abstract: Among the greatest challenges in soft sensor development for bioprocesses are variable process lengths, multiple process phases, and erroneous model inputs due to sensor faults. This review article describes these three challenges and critically discusses the corresponding solution approaches from a data scientist’s perspective. This main part of the article is preceded by an overview of the status quo in the development and application of soft sensors. The scope of this article is mainly the upstream part of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 168 publications
(291 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With increasing LVs, the independent (spectral) and dependent (offline) data of the calibration dataset are fitted more closely to one another as the amount of included covariance increases. However, PLS models with a high number of LVs are prone to overfitting, leading to the inclusion of non-representative signal variations, such as spectral noise [ 66 , 67 , 68 ]. The optimal number of LVs is usually identified using external validation datasets or internal cross-validation methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With increasing LVs, the independent (spectral) and dependent (offline) data of the calibration dataset are fitted more closely to one another as the amount of included covariance increases. However, PLS models with a high number of LVs are prone to overfitting, leading to the inclusion of non-representative signal variations, such as spectral noise [ 66 , 67 , 68 ]. The optimal number of LVs is usually identified using external validation datasets or internal cross-validation methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual data sets with significantly differing correlations can be removed. Another optimization possibility is the addition of a synchronization method [ 23 ] to prepare data sets with varying lengths for MSPC-based selection because previous data sets that indicate similar temporal profiles of the online variables to the current process are chosen for automatic recalibration. However, this neglects the fact that data sets may be adequate for recalibration despite their temporal variances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21). 80,82,282 DTW can also be used to classify anomalous batches and to identify correlating parameters (Fig. 22).…”
Section: Quality Predictive Models and Inferential (Or Soft) Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%