2014
DOI: 10.5539/ijbm.v9n11p48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges of Cost Management in Complex Projects

Abstract: Contingency approaches for understanding complexity in projects are intended to help academics and practitioners make distinctions between different types of projects to better understand the relationship between practices and outcomes when applying different project management processes. In this paper, we build on existing research on complex products and systems (CoPS) to address the challenges of managing costs in projects of varying complexity. Based on a qualitative case study, we identify several challen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research has long emphasized influence of the institutional environment on performance of infrastructure projects (Clegg and Courpasson, 2004; Kadefors, 1995), and impact of institutions as the “shared rules, beliefs and practices…enacted and (re)produced by various actors” on project implementation (Scott, 2014; Tukiainen and Granqvist, 2016, p. 1835). The institutional approach encompasses the past experiences, values and social norms that underpin project organizing (Hodgson and Cicmil, 2007; Kujala et al , 2014; Soderlund, et al , 2017). Morris and Geraldi (2011) have stated that a focus on the institutional level can “improve the performance of projects” because their technical and strategic features are “conditioned, constrained and supported” by their institutional milieu (p. 28).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has long emphasized influence of the institutional environment on performance of infrastructure projects (Clegg and Courpasson, 2004; Kadefors, 1995), and impact of institutions as the “shared rules, beliefs and practices…enacted and (re)produced by various actors” on project implementation (Scott, 2014; Tukiainen and Granqvist, 2016, p. 1835). The institutional approach encompasses the past experiences, values and social norms that underpin project organizing (Hodgson and Cicmil, 2007; Kujala et al , 2014; Soderlund, et al , 2017). Morris and Geraldi (2011) have stated that a focus on the institutional level can “improve the performance of projects” because their technical and strategic features are “conditioned, constrained and supported” by their institutional milieu (p. 28).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, 'Satisfaction with the project' differentiates entities with new product/service development from the three others with a higher score on 'Satisfaction with the project.' However, developing new products/ services in a government setting cer tainly demands multiple perspectives in a complex environment (Hobday, 2000;Kujala, Putila, & Brady, 2013). Second, project management performance also shows a relatively high score.…”
Section: Project Types and Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Innovations will affect cost of the project as well as the project complexity, procurement methods, tendering method and project size [14].…”
Section: Project Management Competenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%