2013
DOI: 10.1111/issj.12054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges of individualisation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18 As van Oorschot notes, deservingness judgements are essentially the flip side of feelings of solidarity: "In fact, one could argue that the difference between both concepts is more a matter of disciplinary origin and context, with `solidarity' having a tradition in sociology, and `deservingness' having its roots in social psychology" (2005: 10n3). 19 For renewed discussions of the general societal trend towards "individualization", and its impact on the prospects for solidarity, see Genov 2015, Edsall 2015 national boundaries. All of these trends and forces would be reshaping solidarity even if there were no change in the levels or composition of ethnic, racial and religious diversity in a society.…”
Section: Is Solidarity In Decline and Is Diversity To Blame?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 As van Oorschot notes, deservingness judgements are essentially the flip side of feelings of solidarity: "In fact, one could argue that the difference between both concepts is more a matter of disciplinary origin and context, with `solidarity' having a tradition in sociology, and `deservingness' having its roots in social psychology" (2005: 10n3). 19 For renewed discussions of the general societal trend towards "individualization", and its impact on the prospects for solidarity, see Genov 2015, Edsall 2015 national boundaries. All of these trends and forces would be reshaping solidarity even if there were no change in the levels or composition of ethnic, racial and religious diversity in a society.…”
Section: Is Solidarity In Decline and Is Diversity To Blame?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, we can argue that, on one hand, in the late/postmodern era, which is also the neoliberal era, individualization is boosted mainly by access to (high) educational and occupational opportunities that expose women and men to the ethos of individualism. On the other hand, we must also take into account the fact that the individualization process is fragmented and takes various forms (Brannen & Nielsen, 2005; De Beer, 2007; Duncan & Smith, 2006; Genov, 2013; Hill Collins, 2009; Jamieson, 2011; Meler, 2016; Rasborg, 2017; Smart & Shipman, 2004; Van Winkle, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it comes as no surprise that the emphasis on individualization is sometimes described as a “white gendered middle-class Eurocentric” approach, which neglects the importance of sociocultural, demographic, and economic contexts and does not provide a comprehensive discussion of several key dimensions on which families differ (Brannen & Nielsen, 2005; De Beer, 2007; Duncan & Smith, 2006; Genov, 2013; Hill Collins, 2009; Jamieson, 2011; Meler, 2016, 2017; Rasborg, 2017; Smart & Shipman, 2004; Van Winkle, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It causes an increasing replacement of the collective patterns of decision-making by the autonomous orientation, decision and practical action of individuals. The rising educational level of individuals strengthens their capacities to competently take decisions and to act autonomously in cross-border migration (Genov, 2015). Given this context the theoretical model of the new economics of migration is less and less applicable in systematic descriptions and explanations of cross-border migration.…”
Section: Preparing the Conceptual Move Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%