2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2017.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges to the census: international trends and a need to consider public health benefits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, to be consistent with the previous editions, some queries should form the unchangeable core of the questionnaire, and the remaining ones, as e.g. Wilson et al (2017) point out, can be modified or extended. Notwithstanding, Esteve and Sobek (2003) call for the standardisation of censuses, as harmonising the core of the questionnaire which addresses socio-economic issues will ensure the comparability of data between countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, to be consistent with the previous editions, some queries should form the unchangeable core of the questionnaire, and the remaining ones, as e.g. Wilson et al (2017) point out, can be modified or extended. Notwithstanding, Esteve and Sobek (2003) call for the standardisation of censuses, as harmonising the core of the questionnaire which addresses socio-economic issues will ensure the comparability of data between countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Other sensitive points regarding Census data are changes in the questionnaires from one Census to other and trends to cut or severely hamper Census and public health information that has occurred internationally [35]. Thus, when one chooses several variables whose meaning expresses the intended "dimension" and lets the principal component analysis point out which is the most important to explain it, the "dimension" in the two or more censuses can be compared.…”
Section: Indicatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the individual-level Census 2013 data to create dichotomous indicators of whether a person has a partner (intimate or de facto or marital); whether a person is currently studying (in a full-time or a part-time basis); however smaller in size than the corresponding Table 4 estimate. This may be potentially due to low response rates among vulnerable groups with lower socio-economic background and higher prevalence of crime (see Wilson et al, 2017).…”
Section: Analysis Of Alternative Samples and Additional Specificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%