Challenges with implementing malaria rapid diagnostic tests at primary care facilities in a Ghanaian district: a qualitative study

Abstract

BackgroundRapid diagnostic Tests (RDTs) for malaria enable diagnostic testing at primary care facilities in resource-limited settings, where weak infrastructure limits the use of microscopy. In 2010, Ghana adopted a test-before-treat guideline for malaria, with RDT use promoted to facilitate diagnosis. Yet healthcare practitioners still treat febrile patients without testing, or despite negative malaria test results. Few studies have explored RDT implementation beyond the notions of provider or patient acceptability. The aim of this study was to identify the factors directly influencing malaria RDT implementation at primary care facilities in a Ghanaian district.MethodsQualitative interviews, focus groups and direct observations were conducted with 50 providers at six purposively selected primary care facilities in the Atwima–Nwabiagya district. Data were analysed thematically.ResultsRDT implementation was hampered by: (1) healthcare delivery constraints (weak supply chain, limited quality assurance and control, inadequate guideline emphasis, staffing limitations); (2) provider perceptions (entrenched case-management paradigms, limited preparedness for change); (3) social dynamics of care delivery (expected norms of provider-patient interaction, test affordability); and (4) limited provider engagement in policy processes leading to fragmented implementation of health sector reform.ConclusionLimited health system capacity, socio-economic, political, and historical factors hampered malaria RDT implementation at primary care facilities in the study district. For effective RDT implementation providers must be: (1) adequately enabled through efficient allocation and management of essential healthcare commodities; (2) appropriately empowered with the requisite knowledge and skill through ongoing, effective professional development; and (3) actively engaged in policy dialogue to demystify socio-political misconceptions that hinder health sector reform policies from improving care delivery. Clear, consistent guideline emphasis, with complementary action to address deep-rooted provider concerns will build their confidence in, and promote uptake of recommended policies, practices, and technology for diagnosing malaria.

The quality of malaria care in 25 low-income and middle-income countries

“…We found important gaps in treatment practices as well—with about two out of three malaria cases being incorrectly managed, much of it due to substantial delays in treatment. Evidence so far shows that this may be due to inadequate guideline emphasis22 or simply lack of knowledge among providers regarding malaria case management 23. In our study countries, we found that undertreatment (26%), specifically monotherapy, was higher than overtreatment (9%) of malaria cases, but both lead to unnecessary wastes in the health system.…”

Use of Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Tests among Medical Doctors in a Tertiary Hospital, South East Nigeria

“…where health care providers in hospitals and larger health centres preferred making diagnosis of malaria through microscopy [19]. This study revealed that more medical doctors in the Internal Medicine Department (43.3%) made diagnosis of malaria by using clinical symptoms than doctors in any other department.…”

The Accuracy and Perception of Test-Based Management of Malaria at Private Licensed Chemical Shops in the Middle Belt of Ghana

“…The health system challenge of perennial shortages of mRDT and other commodities needs to be fixed. [50][51][52] Government-or donor-supported interventions aimed at addressing similar challenges often involve free supply of such commodities. Such interventions are difficult to sustain in the midst of competing health needs and are stopped when funds are depleted.…”