2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2019.05.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges With Left Ventricular Functional Parameters: The Pediatric Heart Network Normal Echocardiogram Database

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean absolute percent difference in 3D LV EF between all centers in our study was 7% with the observed difference of 4.2% if the LV EF was measured at 60%. This is better than the reported 2D LV EF absolute percentage difference of 11.2% in the Pediatric Heart Network study 13 . 3D LV EF has been reported to be more accurate and reproducible than 2D LV EF in adults and children because 3DE does not rely on geometric assumptions and is less affected by acquisition technique such as foreshortening 3,[14][15][16][17][18] .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…The mean absolute percent difference in 3D LV EF between all centers in our study was 7% with the observed difference of 4.2% if the LV EF was measured at 60%. This is better than the reported 2D LV EF absolute percentage difference of 11.2% in the Pediatric Heart Network study 13 . 3D LV EF has been reported to be more accurate and reproducible than 2D LV EF in adults and children because 3DE does not rely on geometric assumptions and is less affected by acquisition technique such as foreshortening 3,[14][15][16][17][18] .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…As such, we chose to apply an a priori cutoff to classify a cohort of critically ill children with at least moderate LV systolic dysfunction. In an effort to avoid potential misclassification of children with minimal LV dysfunction due to inherent variability in LVEF measurement ( 21 ), SAMD was defined a priori as LVEF less than 45%. In contrast to LVEF, strain indices vary significantly by body surface area (BSA) and, thus, age ( 22 , 23 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although echocardiographic ejection fraction (EF) and shortening fraction (SF) have traditionally served to monitor left ventricular systolic function and guide clinical judgement during and after cancer-related therapies, both EF and SF are influenced by ventricular preload and afterload and may not reflect ventricular contractility as much as they represent ventricular remodeling [ 7 ]. Additionally, SF and EF are operator dependent and rely on geometric assumptions, with poor reproducibility reported in a large multi-center study of healthy pediatric patients [ 8 ]. Assessment of tissue deformation by speckle tracking echocardiography may better assess left ventricular contractility with good reproducibility [ 9 ], and although influenced by afterload, has demonstrated the ability to detect subclinical dysfunction after cancer treatment in both pediatric and adult patients [ 10 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%