Challenging and understanding gendered narratives: the development and validation of the transnormativity measure (TM)

The modified gender minority stress measure: A psychometric validation study.

“…The current data represents secondary analysis of data published as part of a measure development project. Participants in Sample 1 completed an online survey that began with an informed consent document followed by demographic questionnaire; items of the developed measures (see Lindley & Budge, 2022, 2024), the Gender Congruence and Life Satisfaction Scale (Jones et al, 2019); the distal and proximal stress scales of the GMSRM (Testa et al, 2015); the Normative Behaviors Subscale of the Heteronormative Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (NB-HABS; Habarth, 2015); and the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale—21 items (DASS-21; Henry & Crawford, 2005); a question instructing participants who would like to complete a brief follow-up survey in 2 weeks to enter a unique personal code; and concluded with a prompt which thanked participants and provided them an opportunity to leave suggestions to improve future studies. Eight engagement checks were dispersed throughout the survey to check the quality of the data and to ensure participants remained consistent in their responses, with participant responses reviewed to ensure they did not enter the same value for all responses.…”

“…Items are averaged with higher scores indicating greater endorsement of heteronormativity. The Normative Behaviors Subscale demonstrated good internal consistency when tested with a sample of TNB individuals (α = .88; Lindley & Budge, 2024).…”