Challenging Carbon Lock-In: Insights From U.S. Governmental Energy Research and Development Expenditures With Advocacy Recommendations for the Energy Research Community

Abstract

The United States relies heavily on fossil and nuclear energy to meet its burgeoning electricity generation demands. The incumbent institutional and industrial power dynamics may support a fossil and nuclear energy status quo and have shown signs of carbon lock-in. Government research and development (R&D) funding can either be a help or hinderance to institutional carbon lock-in. This analysis investigates the link between the Department of Energy's historical funding allocations for energy research programs in the fossil, nuclear, and renewable energy sector, and the federal government's tendency to support entrenched, carbon-based energy systems. While the Department of Energy's renewable energy programs have received more funding in recent years, this investment alone is not enough currently to thwart carbon lock-in. Thus, this article recommends suggestions for researchers to advocate for more renewable energy research and development resources through personal, professional, and institutional strategies to spur decarbonization.

Assessing and prioritizing drivers and strategies for transition to a green energy for sustainable development in China

“…The field of RE is still in its infancy and faces tremendous financial and scientific obstacles. Government incentives and policies have a crucial role in the adoption of RE technologies, which also necessitate large infrastructure and research and development expenditures [ 8 ]. Additionally, resistance to change is common since it may have a detrimental impact on communities and sectors that depend on fossil fuels.…”