2022
DOI: 10.1111/hojo.12463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenging co‐optive criminalisation: Feminist‐centred decarceration strategies for interpersonal and sexualised violence

Abstract: Feminism and prison abolitionism are not theoretically or politically homogenous, and yet in their mainstream versions they are often situated at polar ends of the debate on how to respond to domestic and sexualised violence. The disproportionately gendered nature of sexualised and interpersonal violence has largely centralised such abuses in feminist movements. However, histories of abolitionism -particularly in continental Europe -have largely failed to address the severity of this violence and its impacts. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 55 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a growing body of work, for example, investigating the use of restorative justice processes for domestic and sexual violence (Daly, 2006;McGlynn et al, 2012;Ptacek, 2010;Westmarland et al, 2018;Zinsstag & Keenan, 2017), with the aim of shifting perceptions away from conventional justice approaches. Further work emphasises transformative justice processes providing the accountability and vindication survivors seek, but without the potentially harmful and traumatising effects of criminal justice systems (Kim, 2018;Dixon & Lakshmi Piepzna-Samarasinha, 2020;Davis et al, 2022;Pali & Canning, 2022). This emphasis on justice as beyond conventional understandings of criminal justice is echoed in research with survivors in many different contexts (Antonsdóttir, 2020;Daly, 2017;Holder, 2015Holder, , 2018Jülich, 2006;Keenan, 2014;Zinsstag & Keenan, 2017).…”
Section: Seeking Criminal Justice: Sexual Violence Survivors' Perspec...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a growing body of work, for example, investigating the use of restorative justice processes for domestic and sexual violence (Daly, 2006;McGlynn et al, 2012;Ptacek, 2010;Westmarland et al, 2018;Zinsstag & Keenan, 2017), with the aim of shifting perceptions away from conventional justice approaches. Further work emphasises transformative justice processes providing the accountability and vindication survivors seek, but without the potentially harmful and traumatising effects of criminal justice systems (Kim, 2018;Dixon & Lakshmi Piepzna-Samarasinha, 2020;Davis et al, 2022;Pali & Canning, 2022). This emphasis on justice as beyond conventional understandings of criminal justice is echoed in research with survivors in many different contexts (Antonsdóttir, 2020;Daly, 2017;Holder, 2015Holder, , 2018Jülich, 2006;Keenan, 2014;Zinsstag & Keenan, 2017).…”
Section: Seeking Criminal Justice: Sexual Violence Survivors' Perspec...mentioning
confidence: 99%