2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.tem.2009.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenging estrogen receptor β with phosphorylation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, our data clearly indicate that both c-ABL and EYA2 exert their opposing actions on the antitumor activity of ERβ primarily through Y36. Previous work has also implicated certain phosphoserine residues of ERβ in the regulation of ERβ transcriptional activity (41)(42)(43)(44)(45). It will be of interest to determine whether p-Y36 and the previously identified modification events can act cooperatively or antagonistically to regulate ERβ activity in the transcription and…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Nevertheless, our data clearly indicate that both c-ABL and EYA2 exert their opposing actions on the antitumor activity of ERβ primarily through Y36. Previous work has also implicated certain phosphoserine residues of ERβ in the regulation of ERβ transcriptional activity (41)(42)(43)(44)(45). It will be of interest to determine whether p-Y36 and the previously identified modification events can act cooperatively or antagonistically to regulate ERβ activity in the transcription and…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The short form of ERb1 may not be regulated by PES1 in the same way as the long form. Therefore, differential posttranslational modifications may affect ERb1 function including specific degradation pathways (Sanchez et al 2010, 2012, Cheng et al 2012) and kinetics of turnover, involving particular heterodimers for example, and contribute to a bi-faceted mechanism of action.…”
Section: Endocrine-related Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For ERs, both ligand-induced and ligand-independent activation can be modulated by phosphorylation, in support of a significant role of kinase transduction pathways in differential signaling of ER␣ and ER␤ (28,39,50). More precisely, a cluster of phosphorylation sites has been identified to regulate activation function 1 (AF-1) activity of ER␤ and specific recruitment of coactivators SRC-1 and CBP and of ubiquitin ligase E6-AP, highlighting the key role of this modification in regulation of receptor activity and degradation (31,36,45). Sumoylation has recently been added as a new regulator in the fine-tuning of nuclear receptors and associated coregulator activities (48).…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%