Challenging Residual Contamination of Instruments for Robotic Surgery in Japan

Abstract

BACKGROUND Recently, robotic surgery has been introduced in many hospitals. The structure of robotic instruments is so complex that updating their cleaning methods is a challenge for healthcare professionals. However, there is limited information on the effectiveness of cleaning for instruments for robotic surgery. OBJECTIVE To determine the level of residual contamination of instruments for robotic surgery and to develop a method to evaluate the cleaning efficacy for complex surgical devices. METHODS Surgical instruments were collected immediately after operations and/or after in-house cleaning, and the level of residual protein was measured. Three serial measurements were performed on instruments after cleaning to determine the changes in the level of contamination and the total amount of residual protein. The study took place from September 1, 2013, through June 30, 2015, in Japan. RESULTS The amount of protein released from robotic instruments declined exponentially. The amount after in-house cleaning was 650, 550, and 530 µg/instrument in the 3 serial measurements. The overall level of residual protein in each measurement was much higher for robotic instruments than for ordinary instruments (P<.0001). CONCLUSIONS Our data demonstrated that complete removal of residual protein from surgical instruments is virtually impossible. The pattern of decline differed depending on the instrument type, which reflected the complex structure of the instruments. It might be necessary to establish a new standard for cleaning using a novel classification according to the structural complexity of instruments, especially for those for robotic surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:143-146.

An Incision Closure Bundle for Colorectal Surgery

“…Incomplete cleaning and sterilization of surgical instruments, particularly complex instruments (eg, robotic instruments), also can lead to intraoperative incisional contamination. A recent study concluded that complete removal of residual protein from robotic surgical instruments is “virtually impossible.” (p146)…”

“…• Expert opinion • Peer-reviewed papers 30,31 Comprehensive postoperative instructions for the patient • Expert opinion • Peer-reviewed papers 2,32-37 ACS = American College of Surgeons; SSI = surgical site infection; CHG = chlorhexidine gluconate; IFU = instructions for use.…”

A Response to the Validity of an Article Reporting Contrary Cleaning Efficacy Results for Robotic Surgical Instruments

“…1,2 Patients admitted to these units often stay several weeks to be treated. Guidelines recommend placing high-risk patients in rooms with highefficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtration systems.…”

Challenging Residual Contamination of Instruments for Robotic Surgery in Japan

“…1,2 Barriers to compliance in this setting include crowding, higher patient acuity, nonstandardized workflow, higher staff turnover, lower penetration of HH promotion activities, and high representation of doctors in ED audits, a group with known suboptimal HH compliance. 1,3,4 We sought to use a nationwide dataset to describe HH performance in Australian EDs and to test the hypothesis that lower HH compliance in EDs is explained by a higher proportion of observed HH activity by doctors in this setting.…”