Challenging the Authority of the Medical Definition of Disability: An analysis of the resistance to the social constructionist paradigm

Abstract

This article attempts to explain why the social constructionist paradigm has failed to replace the medical model in American disability theory. The social movement led by American disability activists attempted to reframe the definition of disability using a minority group model based on the social constructionist paradigm. This paper argues that the disability movement was unable to successfully advance the social constructionist paradigm because the activists accepted the Americans With Disabilities Act (1990) despite its ideological basis in the medical model of disability, and the social constructionist theory does not adequately account for the importance of structural constraints to redefinition.

Education and inclusive policy-making: implications for research and practice

“…t:_he source of problems within the individual and JUStifies soc1al mequaht1es on the basis of biological inequalities. Despite ample of evidence that this approach is detrimental and counter-productive to efforts towards inclusion it continues to dominate social conditions, relations and policy practices (Leicester and Lovell 1997, Vlachou 1997, Kerzner Lipsky and Gartner 1999, Barton 2001, Donoghue 2003. By doing so, it totally ignores or overlooks the disabling barriers of an institutional, attitudinal, m_aterial and ideological nature.…”

Recent changes in the proportion of students identified with a disability in Australian schools

“…At the moment, there is an unprecedented level of international debate about the nature of disability which is impacting on the identification of disability (see Donoghue, 2003;Greenspan & Switzky, 2003). In association with this debate, Australia has seen several imperatives that have focused attention on the identification of students with a disability in educational settings in the past decade.…”

Lois en matière de santé mentale au Canada : reconnaître et rectifier une situation problématique

“…L'élément essentiel des théories qui composent ce courant est le suivant : « Le handicap n'est pas intrinsèque, mais plutôt extrinsèque… située non pas dans une pathologie individuelle, mais dans l'incapacité de la société d'accepter des manières variées d'être dans le monde » (Frazee, 2003). La société est décrite comme ayant choisi « de ne pas retirer les contraintes structurelles pour permettre à un plus grand nombre de personnes de participer et d'avoir accès aux ressources sociales » (Donoghue, 2003).…”