2019
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4ce5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chandra Observations of the Spectacular A3411–12 Merger Event

Abstract: We present deep Chandra observations of A3411-12, a remarkable merging cluster that hosts the most compelling evidence for electron re-acceleration at cluster shocks to date. Using the Y X − M scaling relation, we find r 500 ∼ 1.3 Mpc, M 500 = (7.1 ± 0.7) × 10 14 M , kT = 6.5 ± 0.1 keV, and a gas mass of M g,500 = (9.7 ± 0.1) × 10 13 M . The gas mass fraction within r 500 is f g = 0.14 ± 0.01. We compute the shock strength using density jumps to conclude that the Mach number of the merging subcluster is small … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
4
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4. Both Suzaku and XMM-Newton results confirm the southeastern edge is a M ∼ 1.2 shock front, which agrees with the previous result from Chandra surface brightness fit (van Weeren et al 2017;Andrade-Santos et al 2019). Such a low Mach number supports the particle re-acceleration scenario at the shock front.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…4. Both Suzaku and XMM-Newton results confirm the southeastern edge is a M ∼ 1.2 shock front, which agrees with the previous result from Chandra surface brightness fit (van Weeren et al 2017;Andrade-Santos et al 2019). Such a low Mach number supports the particle re-acceleration scenario at the shock front.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Fitting with fixed r edge and C, we obtain C-stat/d.o.f = 76.4/44. If we free the C parameter, the fitted C XMM−Newton = 1.09 ± 0.08, which means the data are consistent with the lack of a density jump, but are consistent with the result of Andrade-Santos et al (2019). The reason that we do not detect an edge in the XMM-Newton profile could be the missing pixels around the edge.…”
Section: Southeastsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations