2022
DOI: 10.1177/10597123221133869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Change-Ability for a World in Flux

Abstract: This article aims to sketch a new integrative perspective on what I call change-ability. I define change-ability as skilled ways of coordinating with a rapidly changing world. Many urgent societal challenges – from climate change to obesity, from the mass extinction of species to fraying social cohesion – require people to collectively change everyday patterns of behaviour they take for granted. The key insight I start from is that to durably change undesirable patterns of behaviour, we could start by changing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First of all, as we have seen above in the reply to Stokhof, RAAAF’s interventions do not foreclose possibilities but are open-ended in that they allow people to find out for themselves what might work for them. Second, we believe it is crucial to promote visions that support change-ability : the skill of coordinating with a rapidly changing world (see Rietveld, 2022b, this volume). Humans are currently living through a time of accelerating social, technological, and ecological change.…”
Section: The Transformative Possibilities Of Engagement With Artworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First of all, as we have seen above in the reply to Stokhof, RAAAF’s interventions do not foreclose possibilities but are open-ended in that they allow people to find out for themselves what might work for them. Second, we believe it is crucial to promote visions that support change-ability : the skill of coordinating with a rapidly changing world (see Rietveld, 2022b, this volume). Humans are currently living through a time of accelerating social, technological, and ecological change.…”
Section: The Transformative Possibilities Of Engagement With Artworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lysen is right to point out that we had discussed The End of Sitting mostly in relation to individual behavioral change, but that change-ability of sociomaterial practices requires collective behavioral change. Most of the excellent questions she raises will be part of my new Change-Ability research project (see Rietveld, 2022b in this volume), so it is too soon to answer these here. For now, it is worth observing how The End of Sitting also changed collective patterns of behavior of the people in the installation.…”
Section: Transforming the Landscape Of Affordancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Skilled Intentionality Framework is a conceptual framework Erik and his team have developed for ecological-enactive cognitive science that aims to investigate human cognitive processes at the organisational scale of the whole person in their skilled engagement with a living environment of affordances (Rietveld et al, 2018). The special issue closes with an opinion article in which Erik outlines the next steps in his research investigating the affordances of artworks (Rietveld, 2022b). Erik provides an overview of the Change-Ability Framework (CAF)a conceptual framework that analyses skills for coordinating with a rapidly changing world.…”
Section: Editorialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, however, much work has been done to extend the scope of embodied and situated accounts to so-called “higher” cognition. Embodied accounts have made headway in understanding imagination (Gallagher, 2017; van Dijk & Rietveld, 2020), mathematical cognition (e.g., Abrahamson et al, 2020; Zahidi & Myin, 2016), anticipation (e.g., Jurgens & Kirchhoff, 2019; Stepp & Turvey, 2015; van Dijk & Rietveld, 2021a), change-ability (Rietveld, 2022), language (Atkinson, 2010; Kiverstein & Rietveld, 2021; Van Den Herik, 2018; van Dijk & Rietveld, 2021b), and more. These works generate doubt about the veracity and productivity of the higher-lower cognition dichotomy and help make sense of the mind using a unified approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%