2007 Third International IEEE Conference on Signal-Image Technologies and Internet-Based System 2007
DOI: 10.1109/sitis.2007.34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Change Detection and Object Tracking in IR Surveillance Video

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare different motion detection methods and identify the best method for different situations using a challenging complete dataset. To this end, we tested the following methods: temporal differencing (frame difference) 86,149,150 , threeframe difference (3FD) [151][152][153] , adaptive background (average filter) 90,154,155 , forgetting morphological temporal gradient (FMTG) 156 ,  Background estimation 157,158 , spatio-temporal Markov field [159][160][161] , running Gaussian average (RGA) 14,162,163 , mixture of Gaussians (MoG) 15,59,164 , spatio-temporal entropy image (STEI) 165,166 , difference-based spatio-temporal entropy image (DSTEI) 166,167 , eigen-background (Eig-Bg) 42,168,169 and simplified self-organized map (Simp-SOBS) 24 methods. Many of these methods (3FD,  ,FMTG, STEI, DSTEI, Simp-SOBS) have not been previously evaluated on challenging dataset, to this end, we used the CDnet2012 The remainder of this paper is organized as follows.…”
Section: Comparative Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare different motion detection methods and identify the best method for different situations using a challenging complete dataset. To this end, we tested the following methods: temporal differencing (frame difference) 86,149,150 , threeframe difference (3FD) [151][152][153] , adaptive background (average filter) 90,154,155 , forgetting morphological temporal gradient (FMTG) 156 ,  Background estimation 157,158 , spatio-temporal Markov field [159][160][161] , running Gaussian average (RGA) 14,162,163 , mixture of Gaussians (MoG) 15,59,164 , spatio-temporal entropy image (STEI) 165,166 , difference-based spatio-temporal entropy image (DSTEI) 166,167 , eigen-background (Eig-Bg) 42,168,169 and simplified self-organized map (Simp-SOBS) 24 methods. Many of these methods (3FD,  ,FMTG, STEI, DSTEI, Simp-SOBS) have not been previously evaluated on challenging dataset, to this end, we used the CDnet2012 The remainder of this paper is organized as follows.…”
Section: Comparative Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are various ways to realize the tracking applications according to the constraints of the problem. The common way for the stationary systems is to detect changes on a static background and extract foreground objects to be tracked (Celenk et al, 2008). In most cases, background modeling with change detection is not suitable for dynamic systems in which the observer is also moving.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%