2018
DOI: 10.1002/oby.22133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Change in BMI Distribution over a 24‐Year Period and Associated Socioeconomic Gradients: A Quantile Regression Analysis

Abstract: The difference in the increase in BMI between low and high percentiles indicates the limited role of mean BMI in reflecting population changes. The results suggest a need to focus on those with low socioeconomic position in the upper ends of the BMI distribution to combat increasing disparities in obesity-related outcomes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…at the lower-or upper-tails) [10]. Quantile regression facilitates assessment across continuous distributions; evidence suggests larger inequalities at the upper-tail of the body mass index (BMI) distribution [11,12]. Secondly, MVPA distributions are not typically normally distributed but are characterised by excess zeros (persons not doing any) and positive skewness (high MVPA for a small number of highly active adults) [13], with each aspect potentially having different determinants [14].…”
Section: (Continued From Previous Page)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…at the lower-or upper-tails) [10]. Quantile regression facilitates assessment across continuous distributions; evidence suggests larger inequalities at the upper-tail of the body mass index (BMI) distribution [11,12]. Secondly, MVPA distributions are not typically normally distributed but are characterised by excess zeros (persons not doing any) and positive skewness (high MVPA for a small number of highly active adults) [13], with each aspect potentially having different determinants [14].…”
Section: (Continued From Previous Page)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar findings have been observed in other studies in the UK, Spain, Norway and the USA (among men). 12–15 Across the literature, there appears to be evidence for a phenomenon that does not seem to have been explicitly noted nor explained—in the minority of cases where the outcome distribution is explicitly investigated, associations between a myriad of risk factors and BMI are progressively larger at the upper ends of the BMI distribution. This includes genetic factors, 16 , 17 behavioural factors (physical activity, sedentary behaviour and diet 18 , 19 ), and family factors (maternal BMI or exercise).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pero mientras la tendencia del sobrepeso se ha desacelerado de 2.5 a 2.4% por década, la tendencia de obesidad se ha acelerado de 3.3 a 5.4% por década. Esto significa que el número de niños obesos aumentó relativamente más que el de niños con sobrepeso, afectando los centilos más altos de la distribución del IMC (Gebremariam et al, 2018;Popkin y Slining, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified