Background:
At present, little research has been done to clarify why some achalasia patients do not lose weight or are even obese and to investigate their nutritional status. The aim of this study was to identify predictive factors of malnutrition in these patients and to assess their response to treatment.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective cohort study on consecutive patients referred to a tertiary-care center for laparoscopic or endoscopic treatment of achalasia. Demographics, anthropometric variables, presenting symptoms, and results of the objective investigation were recorded on a prospectively collected database. The severity of symptoms and the nutritional risk were assessed by the Eckardt score and the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), respectively, before and after treatment.
Results.
Between 2013 and 2019, 171 patients met the study inclusion criteria. There were 87 (50.9%) male and the median age was 53.0 (39–66) years. The median Eckardt score was 6 (interquartile range 3). Based on the MUST score, 121 (70.8%) patients were classified at moderate/high risk of malnutrition. Of these, 93 (76.9%) were overweight or obese. Compared to low-risk group, predictive factors of moderate/high risk of malnutrition were higher Eckardt score [odds ratio (OR) 1.63; 95% CI, 1.35–1.99], more severe dysphagia (OR 2.68, 95% CI, 1.66–4.30), and greater absolute weight loss (OR 2.37; 95% CI, 1.77–3.17). The latter was the only independent predictive factor of malnutrition (OR 2.54; 95% CI, 1.69–3.82). After treatment, the measured MUST score was 0 in 96% of patients.
Conclusions:
Over 70% of achalasia patients were at moderate/high risk of malnutrition. These individuals may benefit from a perioperative multidisciplinary approach including dietary intervention to stabilize weight and improve their nutritional status.