2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00408-016-9911-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Change in Diaphragmatic Thickness During the Respiratory Cycle Predicts Extubation Success at Various Levels of Pressure Support Ventilation

Abstract: Diaphragm US is a valid predictor of extubation success at some but not all PS settings. Using a ∆tdi% of 20 % on PS levels up to 10/5 cm of H2O may reduce both unnecessarily prolonged intubations and prevent emergent reintubations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
40
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
7
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study found that a right DTF of more than or equal to 26% had the most accuracy for predicting weaning successfulness. This result is consistent with the studies from Ferrari et al [ 22 ], DiNino et al [ 27 ], Dube et al [ 18 ], and Blumhof et al [ 28 ] which demonstrated that right DTFs of more than 36, 30, 29, and 20%, respectively, were associated with weaning success and better ICU outcomes. Most of these studies confirmed DTF alone as a better weaning predictor compared to RSBI, in terms of specificity without sensitivity extenuation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our study found that a right DTF of more than or equal to 26% had the most accuracy for predicting weaning successfulness. This result is consistent with the studies from Ferrari et al [ 22 ], DiNino et al [ 27 ], Dube et al [ 18 ], and Blumhof et al [ 28 ] which demonstrated that right DTFs of more than 36, 30, 29, and 20%, respectively, were associated with weaning success and better ICU outcomes. Most of these studies confirmed DTF alone as a better weaning predictor compared to RSBI, in terms of specificity without sensitivity extenuation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Because of its negative impact on weaning, it may be worthwhile to use diaphragm function as a predictor of weaning failure. Patients with weaning failure consistently have a lower TFdi compared to patients with successful weaning ( [5,6,[32][33][34][35]; Table 2). From these studies, the optimal Tfdi cut-off to predict successful weaning ranges from 20 to 36% depending on the ventilator support provided during the measurement; the higher the support, the lower the Tfdi.…”
Section: Presence and Impact Of Diaphragm Dysfunction At The Time Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, TFdi has been shown to be correlated to the pressure-generating capacity of the diaphragm [58,128], to the work of breathing and respiratory effort [118,129] and can be used as a valid tool to identify diaphragm dysfunction [130,131], monitor its temporal changes [29,125] and may predict weaning outcomes in patients under invasive or non-invasive ventilation [53,58,59,132,133]. The reported lower limit of the normal value for TFdi is 20% in healthy subjects and patients with COPD [120,122].…”
Section: Clinical Presentation and Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%