2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11031-017-9608-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Change in physical and psychological health over time in patients with cardiovascular disease: on the benefits of being self-determined, physically active, and eating well

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean internal consistency across the 15 cultures of scores on the AI in college samples was between .72 and .84 (Grouzet et al, 2005). The modified version of the AI was used in many studies and demonstrated consistent internal reliability and associations with health-related outcomes in the expected direction (Guertin et al, 2017a, 2017b, 2018). Individuals’ personal aspiration strivings are stable over a period of 1 year (Sheldon et al, 2004).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mean internal consistency across the 15 cultures of scores on the AI in college samples was between .72 and .84 (Grouzet et al, 2005). The modified version of the AI was used in many studies and demonstrated consistent internal reliability and associations with health-related outcomes in the expected direction (Guertin et al, 2017a, 2017b, 2018). Individuals’ personal aspiration strivings are stable over a period of 1 year (Sheldon et al, 2004).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported internal consistencies of the Healthy and Unhealthy Eating subscales scores were .81 and .82 in college samples, respectively. Items that represent healthy eating on the HUEBS have been used to measure changes in eating behaviors over a period of 6 months (Guertin et al, 2017b). αs in the current sample for the Healthy and Unhealthy Eating subscales were .80 and .84, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the SDT framework, the Regulation of Eating Behavior Scale (REBS; Pelletier et al, 2004) is a valid multidimensional and psychometrically sound instrument developed to specifically explore the motivational dynamics underlying eating behavior regulation. The REBS is an instrument that has been widely used to evaluate the different behavioral regulatory styles proposed by SDT in the eating domain (e.g., Bégin, Fecteau, Bédard, Senécal, & Ratté, 2018;Guertin, Pelletier, & Pope, 2020;Guertin, Pelletier, É mond, & Lalande, 2017;Hamilton, Hoffman, Arsiwalla, Volpe, & Gropper, 2018;Pelletier et al, 2016).…”
Section: The Regulation Of Eating Behavior Scale (Rebs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants' motivation for PA was assessed with a previously used (Guertin, et al, 2017) 6-item scale adapted from Sheldon and Elliot (1999) that asked participants to indicate the extent to which each statement corresponded to the reasons they participated in PA. 2 The items represented intrinsic motivation (purely for the interest and enjoyment in doing physical activity), integrated regulation (interesting or not, I felt that it expresses my true values), identified regulation (because it's important to me to improve my fitness and health), introjected regulation (because I made myself do it to avoid shame or guilt), external regulation (because something about my external situation forced me to do physical activity), and amotivation (I have no idea why I do physical activity). Participants responded to these six items using a 7-point Likert scale that ranged from 1 (does not correspond at all) to 7 (corresponds exactly).…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%