Change in protein flexibility upon complex formation: Analysis of Ras‐Raf using molecular dynamics and a molecular framework approach

Abstract

Changes in flexibility upon protein-protein complex formation of H-Ras and the Ras-binding domain of C-Raf1 have been investigated using the molecular framework approach FIRST (Floppy Inclusion and Rigid Substructure Topology) and molecular dynamics simulations (MD) of in total approximately 35 ns length. In a computational time of about one second, FIRST identifies flexible and rigid regions in a single, static three-dimensional molecular framework, whose vertices represent protein atoms and whose edges represent covalent and non-covalent (hydrogen bond and hydrophobic) constraints and fixed bond angles within the protein. The two methods show a very good agreement with respect to the identification of changes in flexibility in both binding partners on a local scale. This implies that flexibility can be successfully predicted by identifying which bonds limit motion within a molecule and how they are coupled. In particular, as identified by MD, the beta-sheet in Raf shows considerably more pronounced orientational correlations in the bound state compared to the unbound state. Similarly, FIRST assigns the beta-sheet to the largest rigid cluster of the complex. Interestingly, FIRST allows us to identify that interactions across the interface (but not conformational changes upon complex formation) result in the observed rigidification. Since regions of the beta-sheet of Raf that do not interact directly with Ras become rigidified, this also demonstrates the long-range aspect to rigidity percolation. Possible implications of the change of flexibility of the Ras-binding domain of Raf on the activation of Raf upon complex formation are discussed. Finally, the sensitivity of FIRST results with respect to the representation of non-covalent interactions used as constraints is probed.

HIV-1 TAR RNA Spontaneously Undergoes Relevant Apo-to-Holo Conformational Transitions in Molecular Dynamics and Constrained Geometrical Simulations

“…Further details about the underlying rigidity theory and the network parameterization have been described elsewhere. 41,57,58 Given a network representation of the RNA structure, the pebble game, 59 a fast combinatorial algorithm, is applied to exactly enumerate the number and spatial distribution of bond rotational degrees of freedom in the network. Based on the accessibility of rotational degrees of freedom, each bond is identified as part of either a rigid cluster or a flexible link in between.…”

StoneHinge: Hinge prediction by network analysis of individual protein structures

“…Negligible differences have also been noted in a previous ProFlex-based analysis following removal of structural water from the Ras-Raf complex. 48 Removing ligands. All inhibitors and/or cofactors are removed from the structure before the prediction, as they tend to cross-link and rigidify the domains relative to each other.…”

New insight into long‐range nonadditivity within protein double‐mutant cycles

“…In less than a second of the computational time, it identifies all flexible and rigid regions in a protein structure and provides the essential information on local rigidity properties, such as whether a given atom belongs to a particular rigid cluster, overconstrained region, or region participating in a correlated motion. FIRST methodology has been successful in tackling a variety of problems, e.g., in providing a unified view of phase transitions in proteins and network glasses (30), in complementing insight from protein MD simulations (31), and is a basis for the thermodynamic DCM (22).…”