2016
DOI: 10.3402/ecrj.v3.31265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Change in pulmonary diffusion capacity in a general population sample over 9 years

Abstract: RationaleData on the change in diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) over time are limited. We aimed to examine change in DLCO (ΔDLCO) over a 9-year period and its predictors.MethodsA Norwegian community sample comprising 1,152 subjects aged 18–73 years was examined in 1987 and 1988. Of the 1,109 subjects still alive, 830 (75%) were re-examined in 1996/97. DLCO was measured with the single breath-holding technique. Covariables recorded at baseline included sex, age, height, weight, smoking … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary end point was the proportion of patients with a D lco less than 80% of expected. The study was sufficiently powered to detect as statistically significant a 0.12 increase in the proportion of patients with D lco less than 80% of expected among survivors of COVID-19 compared with that observed in a reference population 21 (0.30 vs 0.18, respectively), with an α = .005. Secondary end points were prevalence of a more severe respiratory impairment (defined as D lco <60% of expected), potentially associated with a higher risk of pulmonary fibrosis; factors associated with a D lco less than 80% or less than 60% of expected; prevalence and factors associated with functional impairment (defined as SBBP score <11 or SBBP score ≥11 in presence of a 2-minute walk test score outside of age- and sex-matched reference range); and prevalence and factors associated with moderate to severe PTS symptoms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary end point was the proportion of patients with a D lco less than 80% of expected. The study was sufficiently powered to detect as statistically significant a 0.12 increase in the proportion of patients with D lco less than 80% of expected among survivors of COVID-19 compared with that observed in a reference population 21 (0.30 vs 0.18, respectively), with an α = .005. Secondary end points were prevalence of a more severe respiratory impairment (defined as D lco <60% of expected), potentially associated with a higher risk of pulmonary fibrosis; factors associated with a D lco less than 80% or less than 60% of expected; prevalence and factors associated with functional impairment (defined as SBBP score <11 or SBBP score ≥11 in presence of a 2-minute walk test score outside of age- and sex-matched reference range); and prevalence and factors associated with moderate to severe PTS symptoms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a Norwegian community sample of 1152 subjects, followed over 9 years, a more rapid decline in DLCO was related to higher age, baseline current smoking, more pack years, larger weight and lower FEV1. These reported findings suggest that a direct assessment at the level of parenchymal surrogates is probably more appropriate for the detection of lung parenchymal abnor-malities [62]. Furthermore, it has to be acknowledged that the heterogeneous respiratory impairment in COPD needs a larger armentarium of "lung function tests" [63].…”
Section: The Airflow Tunnel Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a Norwegian community sample of 1152 subjects, followed over 9 years, a more rapid decline in DLCO was related to higher age, baseline current smoking, more pack years, larger weight and lower FEV1. These reported findings suggest that a direct assessment at the level of parenchymal surrogates is probably more appropriate for the detection of lung parenchymal abnormalities [62]. Furthermore, it has to be acknowledged that the heterogeneous respiratory impairment in COPD needs a larger armentarium of "lung function tests" [63].…”
Section: The Airflow Tunnel Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%