2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12187-022-10004-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Change in Socioeconomic Inequality in Minimum Dietary Diversity among Children Aged 6–23 Months in India: Evidence from National Family Health Survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It also re ects in, Nepal Demographic Health Survey 2022, which reports that institutional deliveries were lower among Dalits (70.1%) compared to Brahmin and Chhetri women (86.9%) (18). As Tripathy and Mishra (34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It also re ects in, Nepal Demographic Health Survey 2022, which reports that institutional deliveries were lower among Dalits (70.1%) compared to Brahmin and Chhetri women (86.9%) (18). As Tripathy and Mishra (34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This nding prompts a closer examination of the dynamics between extensive ANC visits and the preference for CS delivery. Increased ANC visits are considered a positive indicator of maternal healthcare engagement, facilitating the early detection and management of potential complications (34,39). However, a clear pattern emerged, with the majority of ANC visitors being urban women with higher economic status and educational levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research has shown that most women in India report their rst antenatal care visit within a median time of 16 weeks of gestation and only 19.6% of pregnancies are detected and registered within the rst trimester. [119,120] Hence, it is likely that we will be enrolling most of our pregnant participants in the gestational period of the 12th -16th week and our ground-data-based exposure assessment will fail to account for the complete picture of rst-trimester exposure. This can be a signi cant limitation since it is plausible that the sensitive window for exposure in this context can be during the rst trimester.…”
Section: Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%