2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1127(02)00304-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Change in soil organic carbon following afforestation of former arable land

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

28
250
4
7

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 431 publications
(289 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
28
250
4
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Nilsen and Strand (2008) found no significant difference in carbon storage related to thinning in a 33-year-old stand. However, Norway spruce stands were able to sequester a significantly higher amount of carbon in developing forest floor compared to oak as reported by Vesterdal et al (2002). The relatively high amount of litterfall (nearly 9,000 kg·ha -1 ) documented at the beginning (Slodicak et al 2005) was not confirmed during the following years of our study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Nilsen and Strand (2008) found no significant difference in carbon storage related to thinning in a 33-year-old stand. However, Norway spruce stands were able to sequester a significantly higher amount of carbon in developing forest floor compared to oak as reported by Vesterdal et al (2002). The relatively high amount of litterfall (nearly 9,000 kg·ha -1 ) documented at the beginning (Slodicak et al 2005) was not confirmed during the following years of our study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…We acknowledge that pseudo-replication is a limitation of the present study, as in many other paired-site and chronosequence studies (Sá et al, 2001;Vesterdal et al, 2002;O'Brien et al, 2003;Chen et al, 2004). Since each stand within a given region was separated by at least 100 m, we believe that the treatment effects are almost certainly more substantial than any possible site differences, given the severity of the treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The study of soil carbon flux in the Loess Plateau is vital not only in supplying basic data for semi-arid areas, but also in providing a useful foundation for soil carbon sequestration assessment after land use change from an agroecosystem to a forest ecosystem, especially as a result of large area reforestation. Moreover, the afforestation of former farmlands has been acknowledged as a land use change that contributes to the mitigation of atmospheric CO 2 emissions (IPCC, 2000;Vesterdal et al, 2002). Forest and grassland are two main land use types after ′Grain to Green′ Program implementation in the Loess Plateau of China, and the result of that soil CO 2 emissions under different vegetation types were different in this area have been reported (Li Hongsheng et al, 2008).…”
Section: Soil Co 2 Emissions and Impact Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%