2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2012.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Change management in evolving web ontologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To maintain the coherence of an ontology during its evolution, the authors of [11][12][13] have proposed a posteriori approaches. This type of approach allows the application of changes in order to evaluate the evolution impact on the ontology, then suggests how to repair inconsistencies in case of problems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To maintain the coherence of an ontology during its evolution, the authors of [11][12][13] have proposed a posteriori approaches. This type of approach allows the application of changes in order to evaluate the evolution impact on the ontology, then suggests how to repair inconsistencies in case of problems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During this project, ontology engineers had to manage naRyQ changes. Based on the methodological guidelines given in [1], we propose the workflow given in Figure 1 for carrying out the ontology evolution activity, then we combined, adapted and extended existing approaches in ontology evolution [8][9][10][11][12][13], and finally we implemented a plug-in, called DynarOnto, to fit naRyQ evolution needs. Our paper is organized as follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the important frameworks are CONCORDIA ( [6]), CHAO ( [7]), Evolva ( [8], [9]), GOMMA ( [10]), COnto-Diff ( [11]) and CHO (Change History Ontology) ( [12], [13], [14]). However, only a few of the frameworks address the change propagation phase, such as [2], [6], [7], [15], [16] and [17].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is essential for sharing information among independent organizations, and exchange information among heterogeneous applications of Information Systems. To make this possible, we need to model the domain knowledge while preserving its semantics [3]. The development of ontologies is becoming a crucial part of semantic web and knowledge management in the organizations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Support for change management is vital to support distributed ontologies. Preserving consistency, while accommodating new changes, is a crucial task that needs special attention [3]. Also, matching between ontologies are easily affected by changes in the ontologies because a change in one ontology could effects the others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%