2012 IEEE 10th International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/iceta.2012.6418619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Change of paradigm for development of software support for eLearning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are two QVT-based proposals [50], [53], but with modest achievements in the automated generation of the analysis level class diagram, as well as several proposals [48], [49], [52], [56], [58] for the semiautomated generation.…”
Section: Process-oriented Models As Starting Pointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two QVT-based proposals [50], [53], but with modest achievements in the automated generation of the analysis level class diagram, as well as several proposals [48], [49], [52], [56], [58] for the semiautomated generation.…”
Section: Process-oriented Models As Starting Pointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the other tools taking BPMN models as a starting base for the CDM generation, we are only able to estimate 35 the completeness that could be achieved by their application to the same set of models. Since all these tools are able to derive the CDM from only one single BPM, like pre-existing AMADEOS, we conclude that they could not achieve higher completeness than pre-existing AMADEOS, since they implement a less complete set of transformation rules.…”
Section: Summative Evaluation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among about twenty papers that consider the BPMN-based MDSDM, only a few papers [64,63,49,34] present some tool (mainly ATL-and QVT-based transformation programs) enabling the automatic MDSDM, but with very low effectiveness. The semiautomatic BPMN-based MDSDM is presented in [65,12,13,32,35], while the other proposals [76,56,35,45,31] are not implemented at all. Regarding the formalism level of the existing BPMN-based approaches, the formal rules are presented in [23,66], and partially in [30,29,31], while the others give only the informal guidelines.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among almost 20 papers, there are three QVT-based proposals [53,54,42], but with modest achievements in the automatic generation of analysis level class diagrams. There is an XSLT-based proposal [29] for automatic generation, as well as several proposals [55,11,12,28,30] for semiautomatic generation of class diagrams. A MDSDM based on BPMN is also considered in [65,48,30], but without implementation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is an XSLT-based proposal [29] for automatic generation, as well as several proposals [55,11,12,28,30] for semiautomatic generation of class diagrams. A MDSDM based on BPMN is also considered in [65,48,30], but without implementation. The formal rules for automatic CDM synthesis based on BPMN are presented in [21,56], and partially in [26,27].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%