2020
DOI: 10.1109/tnse.2020.2973328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Change Point Detection in Dynamic Networks Based on Community Identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that detecting change-points in dynamic networks is a surging research area. More recent development include, in addition to the aforementioned references, Wang et al (2018);Zhu et al (2020a). Also note that the method of Zhao et al (2019) can be applied to detect multiple change-points for any dynamic networks.…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that detecting change-points in dynamic networks is a surging research area. More recent development include, in addition to the aforementioned references, Wang et al (2018);Zhu et al (2020a). Also note that the method of Zhao et al (2019) can be applied to detect multiple change-points for any dynamic networks.…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pensky (2019) studied the theoretical properties (such as the minimax lower bounds for the risk) of dynamic stochastic block model, assuming 'smooth' connectivity probabilities. The literature on change-point detection in dynamic networks include Yang et al (2011); Wang et al (2018); Wilson et al (2019); Zhao et al (2019); Bhattacharjee et al (2020); Zhu et al (2020a). While autoregressive models have been used in dynamic networks for modelling continuous responses observed from nodes (Zhu et al, 2017(Zhu et al, , 2019Chen et al, 2020;Zhu et al, 2020b), to our best knowledge no attempts have been made on modelling the dynamics of adjacency matrices in an autoregressive manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhu e. al. approaches community detection based event detection differently [39]. Instead of detecting communities at each time interval, the authors consider each time interval as nodes of a larger network and detect communities in that large network.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%