2013
DOI: 10.1177/1063293x13482473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Change prediction using interface data

Abstract: Managing change can be challenging due to the high levels of interdependency in concurrent engineering processes. A key activity in engineering change management is propagation analysis, which can be supported using the change prediction method. In common with most other change prediction approaches, the change prediction method has three important limitations: L1: it depends on highly subjective input data; L2: it is capable of modelling 'generalised cases' only and cannot be; customised to assess specific ch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a PSS platform, there are three kinds of interface, the interface between product modules, the interface between service modules, and the interface between product and service modules. The interface between product modules has been fully discussed by many scholars [14,15]. This article concentrates on the interface between service modules and the interface between product and service modules.…”
Section: Phase 2 Modularize Pssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a PSS platform, there are three kinds of interface, the interface between product modules, the interface between service modules, and the interface between product and service modules. The interface between product modules has been fully discussed by many scholars [14,15]. This article concentrates on the interface between service modules and the interface between product and service modules.…”
Section: Phase 2 Modularize Pssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pimmler & Eppinger (1994) used static DSMs to identify and examine alternative product architectures and described four types of interactions referred as spatial (S), material (M), energy (E), and information (I) between the decomposed entities along with the quantification scheme that facilitated weighing interactions amongst them, as shown in Figure 4a. Many researchers (Otto & Wood, 2001;Rahmani & Thomson, 2012;Hamraz et al, 2013;Uddin et al, 2015) have adopted and (Sosa et al, 2003;Jarratt et al, 2004) extended this four-interaction taxonomy. For example, Sosa et al (2003) extended the four-exchange taxonomy with an introduction of fifth type as 'structural' (P) that indicated the requirements related to transferring loads or containment between two interfacing entities.…”
Section: Structural Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Koh changes at a time. Several developments have been presented to the basic CPM (Hamraz et al, 2012;Hamraz et al, 2013b;Ahmad et al, 2013) to enrich the method with a better prediction and change propagation measurements. The most recent extension links the CPM with a function-behavior-structure (FBS) linkage method (Hamraz and Clarkson, 2015).…”
Section: Change Propagation Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%