Changes in 25-(OH) Vitamin D Levels during the SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak: Lockdown-Related Effects and First-to-Second Wave Difference—An Observational Study from Northern Italy

Abstract

Background. We investigated the changes in 25-hydroxy vitamin D [25-(OH)D] concentrations values, during the first and the second pandemic waves and the impact of the lockdown periods, with their different approaches to home confinement, among different age groups. Methods. Daily cloud-modified vitamin D UV dose (UVDVC), for the area of interest (Milano, Italy), was obtained. Single-center 25-(OH)D determinations from 40,996 individuals in a 2019 (pre-pandemic), 32,355 individuals from 1 January to 31 August 2020 (containing the first pandemic wave) and 27,684 individuals from 1 June to 30 November 2020 (containing the second wave) were compared to investigate both the effect of the lockdown on vitamin D status and the association between 25-(OH)D and SARS-CoV-2 positivity. Results. No direct association was found between UVDVC, 25-(OH)D status and SARS-CoV-2 infection. The stringent confinement implemented during the first wave lockdown has not had any effect on 25-(OH)D status, although some peculiar time-restricted profile behaviors can be deduced, possibly due to vitamin D supplementation habits and features of those patients who presented to the hospital during the lockdown period. Conclusions. Although our data do not suggest any direct relationship between 25-(OH)D status, sun exposure, and SARS-CoV-2 infection, an indirect protective role cannot be excluded.

Vitamin D Deficiency Is Associated With Higher Hospitalization Risk From COVID-19: A Retrospective Case-control Study

“…However, the studies included in these systematic reviews exhibited a high risk of various biases, such as inadequate evaluation of the outcome, inappropriate sample selection, and lack of uniformity of the inclusion criteria, and so the certainty of evidence emerging from these studies appears low. On the contrary, a study from Italy ( 14 ) and another from Brazil ( 15 ) clearly refute the probability of a causal link between vitamin D deficiency and susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Therefore, it is imperative to have more evidence based on large population-based studies to reveal the risk of COVID-19 in populations with vitamin D deficiency, and multicenter randomized controlled trials to observe the potential benefits of vitamin D supplementation in treating the disease.…”

The age of iron: an assessment of age-related distribution in paediatric iron studies

“…These results correlate with two retrospective studies from regions of Italy that experienced similar strict lockdown conditions. 2,3…”

Vitamin D in the Covid-19 era: a review with recommendations from a G.I.O.S.E.G. expert panel

“…The sources included the over 50 years old within a wide range of ages, from Asia, Europe and the United States [ 66 ]. A very recently published paper, considering both the so-called first and the second pandemic waves (1st March–30th April 2020 and 1st October–30th November 2020, respectively), based on 40996 25-(OH)D determinations, did not find any direct relationship between VITD status, putative UV dose, and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk [ 67 ].…”