Changes in Aggression of 13-17 year-old Adolescents after Intervention Based on Cognitive-behavioural Therapy

Normantaitė, Dovilė; Perminas, Aidas

doi:10.5755/j01.ss.79.1.4074

Cited by 4 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Sürekli Öfke Ölçeğinden alınabilecek en düşük puan 10, en yüksek puan 40'tır. Öfke İfade Tarzı Ölçeği, öfke içe (13,15,16,20,23,26,27…”

Section: Sürekli öFke Ve öFke Tarz öLçeği (Söötö)unclassified

“…Araştırmacılar, kontrolsüz öfkenin; zorbalık ve saldırgan davranışlarla ilgili en yaygın değişkenlerden biri olduğunu belirtmektedir. Zorbalık davranışı, öfke ifadesi olarak görülebilir (13). Ergenlik döneminde yaşanılan öfke, kendisine ve diğer insanlara fiziksel zarar verme olasılığı yanında, akademik başarı ve akran ilişkilerinin bozulmasına, okuldan uzaklaşmasına veya uzaklaştırılmasına neden olabilmektedir (14).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Relationship of Peer Bullying with Cyberbullying and Anger Expression Styles in Adolescents Attending a Child Psychiatry Clinic

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ÖZAmaç: Ergenler arasında akran zorbalığı evrensel bir sorundur. Çalışmada klinik örneklemde ergenlerde akran zorbalığının demografik değişkenler, siber zorbalık, siber mağduriyet ve öfke ifade tarzlarıyla ilişkisinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler:Çocuk psikiyatri polikliniğine başvuran 61 ergen çalışmaya alındı. Sosyodemografik form, Sürekli Öfke ve Öfke Tarz Ölçeği, Akran Zorbalığı Belirleme Ölçeği-Ergen Formu, Siber Zorbalık Ölçeği ve Siber Mağduriyet Ölçekleri kullanıldı. Ergenlerde psikopatoloji varlığı DSM-5 ölçütleri esas alınarak yapılan klinik değerlendirme ile belirlendi.Bulgular: Çalışmaya katılan 61 ergenin %57.4'ü kızdı. Yaş ortancası 15 yıldı (min=11, maks= 18 yıl). Ergenlerin %27.9'u mağdur, %45.9'u hem zorba hem mağdur ve %4.9'u zorba olarak tanımlandı. Diğer sınıflandırmayla ergenlerin %78.7'sinin zorba/mağdur döngüsünde oldukları saptandı. En sık görülen zorbalık türü; sözel zorbalık (%37.7), en sık görülen mağduriyet türü ise fiziksel mağduriyetti (%60.7). Protez varlığı mağdur grubunda anlamlı düzeyde yüksek bulundu (p=0.041). Zorbalığın orta ergenlikte anlamlı düzeyde yüksek (p=0.026), zorbaların akademik başarısının daha kötü olduğu bulundu (p=0.008). Mağdurların babalarının anlamlı olarak düşük düzeyde eğitim almış oldukları saptandı (p=0.036). Hem zorba hem mağdur grupta; siber zorbalık, Sürekli Öfke ve Öfke Tarz Ölçeği öfke dışa alt ölçeği ve öfke içe alt ölçeği puanları, zorbalığa karışmayan grubun puanlarına göre anlamlı düzeyde yüksek bulundu (sırasıyla; z=-3.167, p=0.003; z=-3.735, p=<0.001, F=7.372, p=0.001).Sonuç: Kötü akademik başarının zorbalık; babanın ilköğretim mezunu olmasının mağdur olma için riski artırdığı ve zorbalığa katılımın; siber zorbalık, siber mağduriyet ve sürekli öfke, öfke içe ve dışa puanlarını artırdığı söylenebilir. Farkındalığın ve müdahalelerin artırılması açısından ayrıntılı, ülkemizi temsil edebilecek, daha uzun süreli araştırmalara ihtiyaç vardır. ABSTRACTObjective: Peer bullying among adolescents is a universal problem. The aim of this study was to investigate the relation of peer bullying groups with demographic data, cyber bullying, cyber victimization, and anger expression styles in a clinical adolescent sample. Material and Methods:Sixty-one adolescents who presented to the child psychiatry outpatient clinic were included in the study. Sociodemographic form, State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory, Peer Bullying Scale Adolescent Form, Cyber Bullying Scale and Cyber Victimization Scale were completed by the adolescents. The presence of psychopathology was determined according to the DSM-5 criteria.Results: Of the total 61 adolescents, 57.4% were girls. The median age was 15 years (range: 11-18 years). 27.9% of the adolescents were identified as the victim, 45.9% as the bully-victim and 4.9% as the bully. Based on the discriminant analyses, 78.7% of the adolescents were found to be in the bully/victim cycle. The most common bullying type was verbal bullying (37.7%) and the most common victimization type was physical victimization (60.7%)...

show abstract

“…Sürekli Öfke Ölçeğinden alınabilecek en düşük puan 10, en yüksek puan 40'tır. Öfke İfade Tarzı Ölçeği, öfke içe (13,15,16,20,23,26,27…”

Section: Sürekli öFke Ve öFke Tarz öLçeği (Söötö)unclassified

Section: Introductionunclassified

The Relationship of Peer Bullying with Cyberbullying and Anger Expression Styles in Adolescents Attending a Child Psychiatry Clinic

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This questionnaire is one of the most used instruments to assess aggression (Reyna et al, 2011). A double translation from English to Lithuanian and back in English has been provided by D. Normantaite and L. Normantiene (Normantaite et al, 2013).…”

Section: Psychometric Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A research made in Lithuania showed that school-based intervention can significantly reduce aggressive behaviour (Normantaite et al, 2013). The authors of previous research claimed that urban adolescents were more aggressive than rural adolescents.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Individual Level of Social Innovations for Rural Development: Aggression Among Rural Adolescents

Valiūnė

2018

Proccedings of International Scientific Conference "RURAL DEVELOPMENT 2017"

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Social innovation is very important for rural development. It is a lack of researchers about an individual level of social innovations in Lithuania. Adolescents’ aggression is an important social problem that can affect society and social innovations. It needs to find the differences in aggression between rural and urban adolescents because it could help to plan effective interventions for reducing aggressive behavior. The present study aimed to assess the aggression among rural and urban adolescents. It was hypothesized that rural and urban adolescents differ significantly on aggression. In order to verify the above hypothesis a sample of 479 (207 boys; 272 girls) students were selected from Lithuanian schools. The sample includes the similar size of rural (N=242) and urban (N=237) students. The age of participants was from 12 to 17. It was used Aggression Questionnaire developed by Buss and Perry (1992) in this research. The questionnaire involves four subscales: physical aggression, verbal aggression, anger, and hostility. The results showed that urban girls had more physical aggression than rural girls. However, it was not found statistically significant differences in physical aggression among urban and rural boys. Also, it was not found any statistically significant differences in verbal aggression, anger, hostility among urban and rural adolescents.

show abstract

“…Nevertheless, bullying and aggressive behaviour can be the result of various factors; researchers state that uncontrolled anger is one of the most common variables related to such behaviour. Bullying behaviour can be viewed as an act of anger expression like aggressive behaviour (Hussian & Sharma, 2014;Normantaite & Perminas, 2013). Therefore, anger, aggression and bullying were involved in this research.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Differences in anger, aggression, bullying among adolescents in different self-esteem groups

Valiūnė

Perminas

2016

GJGC

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of the study was to compare anger, aggression, bullying among adolescents in three self-esteem groups. Rosenberg Self-esteem scale and Buss & Perry Aggression questionnaire were used for the study. Bullying was measured with questions: How often have you been bullied by other students? How often have you bullied someone? 575 adolescents participated in the study. Results showed that the scores of physical aggression, anger, hostility, bullying victims were significantly higher in lowest self-esteem group compared with middle and high self-esteem groups among girls. It was found that the scores of anger were significantly higher in lowest self-esteem group compared with middle and high self-esteem groups among boys. The scores of hostility were significantly higher in lowest self-esteem group compared with middle and highest self-esteem groups among boys. Also the hostility was significantly higher in middle self-esteem group compared with the highest self-esteem group among boys. The scores of bullying victims were significantly higher in lowest self-esteem group compared with highest self-esteem groups among boys. The results indicated that the issue of adolescent anger related problem such hostility, bullying victims, self-esteem must be underlined in educational and counseling programs. Keywords: anger; aggression; bullying; self-esteem; adolescence.

show abstract

Changes in Aggression of 13-17 year-old Adolescents after Intervention Based on Cognitive-behavioural Therapy

Cited by 4 publications

References 10 publications

The Relationship of Peer Bullying with Cyberbullying and Anger Expression Styles in Adolescents Attending a Child Psychiatry Clinic

The Relationship of Peer Bullying with Cyberbullying and Anger Expression Styles in Adolescents Attending a Child Psychiatry Clinic

An Individual Level of Social Innovations for Rural Development: Aggression Among Rural Adolescents

Differences in anger, aggression, bullying among adolescents in different self-esteem groups

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About