1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-2046(98)00058-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in agricultural land use in Estonia in the 1990s detected with multitemporal Landsat MSS imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
40
1
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
40
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, multi-spectral scanners are restricted by lower data availability due to haze or clouds, especially when based on a satellite system. This fact is documented in many studies where lower classification accuracies result from insufficient input data [14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Nevertheless, multi-spectral scanners are restricted by lower data availability due to haze or clouds, especially when based on a satellite system. This fact is documented in many studies where lower classification accuracies result from insufficient input data [14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…It is also applicable to the world [56], Central and Eastern Europe, where agriculture is dominant [56][57][58], and in Poland [59][60][61]. Studies by Łowicki [62] and Zydroń and Hausa [63] for Wielkopolska and Senetra et al [64] conducted in the Warmia and Mazury region confirm similar changes in the structure of land use to the ones in the Małopolskie Voivodeship as well.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In urban regions, agricultural areas are increasingly seen as potential areas for development, rather than as sites for agricultural production. A reduction in areas of arable land over the last two decades has also been typical for other CEECs and northern European countries in which an agricultural landscape dominates (Mander & Jongman 1998;Peterson & Aunap 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%