ypertension is widely recognized as a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease. 1,2 When initiating antihypertensive treatment, it is important to assess clinical characteristics and the severity of organ damage. [3][4][5] The plasma level of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is well established as a useful marker of cardiac dysfunction, prognosis and response to treatment in patients with heart failure. [6][7][8][9] In patients with heart failure, secretion of BNP increases in proportion to the severity of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, as indicated by the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and LV end-diastolic pressure or the New York Heart Association class. 6,10 However, the measurement of BNP for clinical guidelines in hypertension is not recommended at present. 5 It has been reported that BNP is also increased in hypertensive patients without heart failure and in community residents with hypertension. 11-14 Hypertensive patients with cardiac hypertrophy have higher plasma BNP concentrations and the patients with increased BNP suffer from a higher incidence of cardiac events. 11,12 Recently, diastolic failure has attracted more attention in relation to hypertensive heart disease and this is associated with an increase in BNP. 15,16 Early and accurate diagnosis of diastolic failure is important to improve the prognosis of patients with heart failure. However, the role of BNP in the clinical assessment of hypertension has not been fully investigated and the actual meaning of a slight increase in BNP is still unclear. [11][12][13] The Framingham study demonstrated that an increase in BNP predicted the risk of death and cardiovascular events in community residents. 17 Neurohumoral factors become activated and play important roles in the pathophysiology of chronic heart disease. It would be helpful in general practice if BNP could be used as a marker of the risk of cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients.In the present study, we examined the relationship between plasma BNP levels and various clinical parameters to assess the usefulness of BNP as a marker for the severity of hypertension or organ damage in untreated hypertensives. The patients were clinically graded by BNP level.
MethodsThe present study group comprised 154 persons with essential hypertension who attended our outpatient clinic (84 Circ J 2008; 72: 770 -777 (Received July 30, 2007; revised manuscript received October 22, 2007; accepted December 19, 2007
Methods and ResultsThe relationship between the plasma BNP level and various clinical parameters was examined in 154 untreated hypertensive patients without heart failure or atrial fibrillation (mean age: 58.0±10.7; mean blood pressure: 164.5±15.2/99.1±9.7 mmHg; mean BNP: 32.7±36.7 pg/ml). First, the patients were divided into 2 groups based on BNP: normal (<18.5 pg/ml, mean 9.7±5.7, n=69); or elevated (>18.5 pg/ml, mean 51.4± 40.4, n=85). The elevated BNP group had a significantly greater electrocardiographic voltage index (SV1+RV5; 3.7±1.2 vs 3.2±0.8 mV, p=0.0029), cardiothora...