1996
DOI: 10.1080/1065657x.1996.10701849
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Chemical, Physical and Biological Properties Of Passively-Aerated Cocomposted Poultry Litter And Municipal Solid Waste Compost

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This confirmed the need for either an insulating layer of compost, peat or other suitable material (Rynk 1992), or an impermeable barrier, in further trials. The extent of the thermophilic periods in both manure/amendment/woodchips trials compared to 40-70 days found by Cooperbrand & Middleton (1996) for a field scale passively aerated system treating poultry litter and municipal solid waste.…”
Section: Temperature Profilesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This confirmed the need for either an insulating layer of compost, peat or other suitable material (Rynk 1992), or an impermeable barrier, in further trials. The extent of the thermophilic periods in both manure/amendment/woodchips trials compared to 40-70 days found by Cooperbrand & Middleton (1996) for a field scale passively aerated system treating poultry litter and municipal solid waste.…”
Section: Temperature Profilesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The microbial respiratory activity in compost samples was measured based on CO 2 -C evolution rate conducted in closed bottles according to Öhlinger [15] and Alef [16] soil respiration techniques, but with some modifications made to techniques based on similar soil respiration procedures reported in literature [17][18][19][20][21]. CO 2 -C was trapped in an alkaline solution (KOH), which was then titrated with HCl.…”
Section: Respiration Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, nutrient loss is an unavoidable problem during the composting of organic waste. This is especially the case for nitrogen, the most essential fertilizer nutrient for crop production in many situations (Cooperband and Middleton 1996;Rao Bhamidimarri and Pandey 1996). According to previous research, total nitrogen (TN) loss during the course of composting organic waste ranged from 16% to 76% (Barrington et al 2002;Raviv et al 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%