2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(00)00134-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in cochlear electrical stimulation induced Fos expression in the rat inferior colliculus following deafness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with other animal models, cochlear implantation in the rat is considered surgically difficult, and while there are a number of acute studies in this species (Nagase et al, 2000;Wu et al, 2003;Hsu et al, 2001;Vischer et al, 1997;Paolini and Clark, 1998;Shepherd et al, 2004), there has been no chronic cochlear implantation reported. The reasons for this difficulty includes: i) relatively smaller size of the rat cochlea; ii) the difficulty in developing such a small multiple channel scala tympani electrode array; and iii) the presence of the stapedial or pterygopalatine artery (SA), located in the middle ear cavity (Govaerts et al, 1993;Judkins and Li, 1997;Praetorius et al, 2001;Pinilla et al, 2001;Yamamoto et al, 2003), severely reducing surgical access to the scala tympani.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with other animal models, cochlear implantation in the rat is considered surgically difficult, and while there are a number of acute studies in this species (Nagase et al, 2000;Wu et al, 2003;Hsu et al, 2001;Vischer et al, 1997;Paolini and Clark, 1998;Shepherd et al, 2004), there has been no chronic cochlear implantation reported. The reasons for this difficulty includes: i) relatively smaller size of the rat cochlea; ii) the difficulty in developing such a small multiple channel scala tympani electrode array; and iii) the presence of the stapedial or pterygopalatine artery (SA), located in the middle ear cavity (Govaerts et al, 1993;Judkins and Li, 1997;Praetorius et al, 2001;Pinilla et al, 2001;Yamamoto et al, 2003), severely reducing surgical access to the scala tympani.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By restoring auditory input to the brain, cochlear implants (CIs) induce changes in cerebral function that affect neural structures ranging from cochlear nuclei [Lustig et al, 1994] to extra-auditory cortical territories [Giraud et al, 2001a, b], and that involve all levels of neural organisation from intracellular components [Nagase et al, 2000] to large-scale cortical networks [Naito et al, 2000]. Depending on whether subjects have acquired auditory language prior to deafness or not, implantation corresponds to the discovery of a new sensory modality that minimally interferes with language, or to the restoration of a sense that is essential for communication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, there is a resulting influence on the balance between excitation and inhibition reflected in changes in neuronal response profiles (Bledsoe et al, 1995;Caspary et al, 1995;Francis and Manis, 2000;Kaltenbach and Afman, 2000;Mossop et al, 2000;Salvi et al, 2000;Syka and Rybalko, 2000) as well as in changes in tonotopic maps (Willott et al, 1982(Willott et al, , 1993Robertson and Irvine, 1989;Schwartz et al, 1993;Rajan and Irvine, 1998;Salvi et al, 1999;Nagase et al, 2000). A shift towards decreased inhibition and increased excitation has been reported in the CIC (Vale and Sanes, 2002) associated with decreases in GABA release (Bledsoe et al, 1995) and decreases in the GABA synthesizing enzyme GAD (Mossop et al, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%