2022
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191912849
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Collective Efficacy’s Preventive Effect on Intimate Partner Violence during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract: Following the logic of studies showing that collective efficacy within neighborhoods deters intimate partner violence (IPV), the promotion of social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic may have weakened that effect. To examine that possibility, we analyzed panel data from 318 adults in Japan regarding IPV victimization and perceived collective efficacy at four time points. A latent growth model (LGM) analysis for each measure revealed that informal social control, a subscale of collective efficacy, has dec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
(75 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If these were relevant opportunities to satisfy their desire to dominate, control, or punish a partner, or frictions that created negative sentiments toward their partner, this would have increased temptations and provocations they might respond to with IPA. It is also possible the prevalence of these opportunities and frictions declined during stay-at-home restrictions, as people may have perceived less need to dominate or control their partners, for example, their movement and activities, and fewer transgressions, for example, occurring outside the home or when socializing with others (Bhuptani et al, 2023; Bradbury-Jones & Isham, 2020; Kaukinen, 2020; Ragavan et al, 2022; Soeiro et al, 2023; Souma et al, 2022; Trafford, 2022).…”
Section: Beyond Opportunities and Strain: Satmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If these were relevant opportunities to satisfy their desire to dominate, control, or punish a partner, or frictions that created negative sentiments toward their partner, this would have increased temptations and provocations they might respond to with IPA. It is also possible the prevalence of these opportunities and frictions declined during stay-at-home restrictions, as people may have perceived less need to dominate or control their partners, for example, their movement and activities, and fewer transgressions, for example, occurring outside the home or when socializing with others (Bhuptani et al, 2023; Bradbury-Jones & Isham, 2020; Kaukinen, 2020; Ragavan et al, 2022; Soeiro et al, 2023; Souma et al, 2022; Trafford, 2022).…”
Section: Beyond Opportunities and Strain: Satmentioning
confidence: 99%