2020
DOI: 10.14397/jals.2020.54.2.25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Community Structure of Understory Vegetation by Silvicultural Treatments in a <i>Larix kaempferi</i> Plantation Forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Around thirteen years after thinning, AGC in the LT recovered from the disturbance to the level before thinning, suggesting the canopy gap in the LT also recovered or got closed to the level in 2006. The increase in SR after thinning may be due to an increase in light-preferred species related to the openness of the canopy in the overstory and increased early seral species on the disturbed forest floor (Ares et al 2009;Fahey and Puettmann 2007;Kim et al 2020). On the other hand, the decrease in SR across treatments in 2016 and 2021 may be considered a closed canopy and drought (Korea Meteorological Administration 2023), especially for LT. Another possible reason for the decrease in SR is probably that late seral species are competitively excluded by early seral species (Burton et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Around thirteen years after thinning, AGC in the LT recovered from the disturbance to the level before thinning, suggesting the canopy gap in the LT also recovered or got closed to the level in 2006. The increase in SR after thinning may be due to an increase in light-preferred species related to the openness of the canopy in the overstory and increased early seral species on the disturbed forest floor (Ares et al 2009;Fahey and Puettmann 2007;Kim et al 2020). On the other hand, the decrease in SR across treatments in 2016 and 2021 may be considered a closed canopy and drought (Korea Meteorological Administration 2023), especially for LT. Another possible reason for the decrease in SR is probably that late seral species are competitively excluded by early seral species (Burton et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the decrease in SR across treatments in 2016 and 2021 may be considered a closed canopy and drought (Korea Meteorological Administration 2023), especially for LT. Another possible reason for the decrease in SR is probably that late seral species are competitively excluded by early seral species (Burton et al 2013). Some light-preferred or early seral species invaded first after thinning, occupied certain areas, and became dominant (Kim et al 2020). For example, Z. schinifolium at the shrub layer, R. crataegifolius, and A. arguta at the understory layer were dominant from 2011 to 2021 for the LT and HT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%