Changes in costs and effects after the implementation of disease management programs in the Netherlands: variability and determinants

Abstract

ObjectivesThe aim of the study was to investigate the changes in costs and outcomes after the implementation of various disease management programs (DMPs), to identify their potential determinants, and to compare the costs and outcomes of different DMPs.MethodsWe investigated the 1-year changes in costs and effects of 1,322 patients in 16 DMPs for cardiovascular risk (CVR), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and diabetes mellitus (DMII) in the Netherlands. We also explored the within-DMP predictors of these changes. Finally, a cost-utility analysis was performed from the healthcare and societal perspective comparing the most and the least effective DMP within each disease category.ResultsThis study showed wide variation in development and implementation costs between DMPs (range:€16;€1,709) and highlighted the importance of economies of scale. Changes in health care utilization costs were not statistically significant. DMPs were associated with improvements in integration of CVR care (0.10 PACIC units), physical activity (+0.34 week-days) and smoking cessation (8% less smokers) in all diseases. Since an increase in physical activity and in self-efficacy were predictive of an improvement in quality-of-life, DMPs that aim to improve these are more likely to be effective. When comparing the most with the least effective DMP in a disease category, the vast majority of bootstrap replications (range:73%;97) pointed to cost savings, except for COPD (21%). QALY gains were small (range:0.003;+0.013) and surrounded by great uncertainty.ConclusionsAfter one year we have found indications of improvements in level of integrated care for CVR patients and lifestyle indicators for all diseases, but in none of the diseases we have found indications of cost savings due to DMPs. However, it is likely that it takes more time before the improvements in care lead to reductions in complications and hospitalizations.

Emergency readmissions are substantially determined by acute illness severity and chronic debilitating illness: A single centre cohort study

“…Our study does not determine the pathway through which total daily admissions mediate its effect on readmissions, the most likely hypothesis is that it reflects overstretching of physicians during the crucial early hours of an admission leading to an avoidable reduction in the quality of care provided. However, while chronic disease management programmes may be cost effective and reduce readmission rates, the load on the hospital with its capacity constraints would all require extra resources from the public purse in an era of austerity [32][33][34][35].…”

Development of an integral assessment approach of health status in patients with obstructive airway diseases: the CORONA study

“…Another aspect is the economies of scale, ie, costs per patient reduce when using facilities for a larger target group. 15 …”

Are treatment guides and rational drug use policies adequately exploited in combating respiratory system diseases?

“…Tsiachristas et al investigated the changes in cost-effectiveness in 1322 patients treated in 16 different disease management plans. These authors observed that physical activity (21%) in COPD patients had a significant positive effect on costeffectiveness [41].…”