“…Average dendritic length per labeled motoneuron was estimated by summing the measured dendritic lengths of the series of sections, multiplying by two to correct for sampling, then dividing by the total number of labeled motoneurons in that series. This method does not attempt to assess the actual total dendritic length of labeled motoneurons (Kurz et al, 1991), but has been shown to be a sensitive and reliable indicator of changes in dendritic morphology in normal development (Goldstein et al, 1990(Goldstein et al, , 1993Goldstein and Sengelaub, 1993), in response to hormonal manipulation (Kurz et al, 1986;Forger and Breedlove, 1987;Goldstein et al, 1990;Kurz et al, 1991;Sengelaub, 1992, 1994;Burke et al, 1997Burke et al, , 1999Hebbeler and Sengelaub, 2003), after changes in dendritic interactions (Goldstein et al, 1993), after alterations in afferent input (Kalb, 1994;Hebbeler et al, 2002;Hebbeler and Sengelaub, 2003), and after maternal care manipulations (Lenz and Sengelaub, 2006).…”