1997
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.95279.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Distribution and Abundance of the Loggerhead Shrike

Abstract: The Loggerhead Shrike (Lanius ludovicianus) was once widely distributed and common over most of North America, occupying an exclusive breeding range with no other shrikes. Although it occurs in a wide variety of plant associations, this shrike is generally found in landscapes characterized by widely spaced shrubs and low trees interspersed with short grasses, forbs, and bare ground, habitats which include deserts, scrub lands, savannas, and some agricultural settings. The Loggerhead Shrike seems to have been a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Winter precipitation was the primary driver of nest survival, and overall precipitation was also important. Loggerhead shrikes have experienced range-wide population declines across a variety of habitat types (Cade and Woods 1997;Pruitt 2000), and temperature has been shown to be and important factor in driving success in northern bird populations (Chabot et al 2001;Collister and Wilson 2007;Skagen and Yackel Adams 2012), but the relationship between breeding success and precipitation is first described here. As the !…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Winter precipitation was the primary driver of nest survival, and overall precipitation was also important. Loggerhead shrikes have experienced range-wide population declines across a variety of habitat types (Cade and Woods 1997;Pruitt 2000), and temperature has been shown to be and important factor in driving success in northern bird populations (Chabot et al 2001;Collister and Wilson 2007;Skagen and Yackel Adams 2012), but the relationship between breeding success and precipitation is first described here. As the !…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Identifying patterns of migratory behavior and nonbreeding season population dynamics remains a high priority, and also a challenge, for most migratory bird species of conservation concern (Elser, 2000;Faaborg et al, 2010;Martin et al, 2007;Runge et al, 2014), in particular, as migratory connectivity impacts the interplay of events throughout the annual cycle (Hostetler et al, 2015). For Loggerhead Shrike, the lack of information on the wintering grounds and wintering ecology has been the greatest obstacle to conservation planning (Cade & Woods, 1997;Pruitt, 2000). Herein, we provide a broad-scale perspective on migratory patterns that both demonstrate the utility of a Bayesian approach using intrinsic markers and add to the growing body of literature regarding its implications for ecology, evolution, and conservation.…”
Section: Conservation Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…North American Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) data (Sauer et al, 2017) indicate significant (3.18% year −1 ) and range-wide population declines in Loggerhead Shrike since the inception of the BBS in the 1960s, and it has been identified by the North American Bird Conservation Initiative as a "Common Bird in Steep Decline" (Berlanga et al, 2010). Habitat loss due to succession and human development likely contributed to the initial declines (Cade andWoods 1997, Pruitt, 2000), but continued population declines are outpacing habitat loss in the breeding season suggesting other limiting factors (Pruitt, 2000). Migratory populations have experienced more persistent and drastic declines than nonmigratory conspecifics (Sauer et al, 2017), highlighting the need to quantify migratory K E Y W O R D S deuterium, differential migration, leap-frog migration, microsatellites, migratory connectivity, stable isotopes connectivity and migration patterns such that limiting factors on stopover sites and on the wintering grounds can be identified and addressed (Pruitt, 2000;Tischendorf, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Loggerhead Shrike Lanius ludovicianus, like many other grassland bird species, has shown sustained declines in abundance across its range over the last few decades (Cade & Woods 1997, Berlanga et al 2010, Fink et al 2022). As such, the Loggerhead Shrike is included, along with many other species, as being of conserva?on concern by the tri-na?onal (Canada-USA-Mexico) Partners in Flight bird conserva?on ini-?a?ve (Berlanga et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Mexico, it is mainly a breeding resident and is the only one of the two North American shrike species to commonly occur in the country (Howell & Webb 1995). Long-term monitoring data from the Breeding Bird Survey and the Christmas Bird Count in North America have shown substan?al declines of Loggerhead Shrike popula-?ons since 1995 (Sauer et al 1995, Cade & Woods 1997, with an es?mated decline of 3.2% per year between 1966 to 2011 (Sauer et al 2017). More recently, eBird Status and Trends 2007-2021(Fink et al 2022 showed that con?nental popula-?ons con?nue in decline (up to 30%) over most of the species' range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%